2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield gap analysis and resource footprints of Irish potato production systems in Zimbabwe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
38
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Actual yields range from below 5 Mg fresh tubers ha −1 (median yield in Uganda: Gildemacher et al, 2009a) to well above 120 Mg fresh tubers ha −1 (actual yield under optimal conditions across years in Columbian Basin, USA: Kunkel and Campbell, 1987). The difference between potential yield and actual yield is called the yield gap (Svubure et al, 2015). Often the ratio between actual and potential yield is used to normalize the gap.…”
Section: Definitions Of Potential and Actual Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actual yields range from below 5 Mg fresh tubers ha −1 (median yield in Uganda: Gildemacher et al, 2009a) to well above 120 Mg fresh tubers ha −1 (actual yield under optimal conditions across years in Columbian Basin, USA: Kunkel and Campbell, 1987). The difference between potential yield and actual yield is called the yield gap (Svubure et al, 2015). Often the ratio between actual and potential yield is used to normalize the gap.…”
Section: Definitions Of Potential and Actual Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recent studies which applied the LINTUL-POTATO-DSS model were analysed and compared. Where certain data such as the length of the growing season is not mentioned in ), A/P = ratio of actual potential yield a Figure 4 and Table 7 b Haverkort, A J. unpublished, the calculations were done for the present publication c Haverkort et al (2014) d Haverkort et al (2013) e Molahlehi et al (2013),* f Svubure et al (2015) the publication cited, the original data on which the publication was based, were consulted. The results are shown in Table 10.…”
Section: Results Of the Ten Potato-growing Districts Of Hokkaidomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crop growth models have previously been used to investigate the effects of management options such as planting dates, population density, irrigation timing and frequency, and fertiliser applications in different environmental conditions on crop growth and yield (Molahlehi et al 2013;Svubure et al 2015). Therefore, simulation models could potentially also be useful to help improve yield forecasts for the potato processing industry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, high yields do not necessarily lead to the best quality because recovery at the factory level mainly depends on high dry matter content (DMC), and uniform and relatively large tuber sizes. Both yield and quality of potato tubers are influenced by various yield determining, limiting and reducing factors (Haverkort and Struik 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%