2016
DOI: 10.9734/ajea/2016/22981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield Losses and Path Coefficient Analysis of Head Smut Disease (Tolyposporium penicillariae) in Pearl Millet Genotypes

Abstract: Head smut caused by Tolyposporium penicillariae Bref. is a devastating fungal disease that cause up to 30% yield losses in pearl Millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.). An experiment was carried out in two sites (Koibatek and Marigat) in Kenya to estimate the losses in grain yield due to head smut at varying levels of susceptibility in 50 promising advanced pearl millet genotypes. The test germplasm were planted in a complete randomized block design (RCBD) in three replicates during the short rains (Sept-Dec 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trait SSP showed significant genotypic negative association with SPW and PIP. The result is in concordance withLilian et al, (2016) who noted significant negative correlation of disease incidence and severity of head smut with 1000 seed weight of pearl millet. The trait number of secondary rachis per panicle (NSRPa) exhibited significant positive phenotypic and genotypic correlations with resistance traits viz., NIT, NIGP, PIT and genotypic correlation alone with PIP, while phenotypic correlation alone with the agronomic trait viz., SPW.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The trait SSP showed significant genotypic negative association with SPW and PIP. The result is in concordance withLilian et al, (2016) who noted significant negative correlation of disease incidence and severity of head smut with 1000 seed weight of pearl millet. The trait number of secondary rachis per panicle (NSRPa) exhibited significant positive phenotypic and genotypic correlations with resistance traits viz., NIT, NIGP, PIT and genotypic correlation alone with PIP, while phenotypic correlation alone with the agronomic trait viz., SPW.…”
supporting
confidence: 92%