2004
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-825657
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Bile Duct Lesions

Abstract: The practice of EUS-FNA has improved the diagnostic yield of EUS. These results suggest that it is a safe and useful procedure for investigating biliary masses or strictures that have hitherto caused considerable diagnostic confusion, especially in patients with negative brush cytology findings. The possibility of false-negative findings remains, but core biopsy needles may improve the situation. The results of further studies are awaited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
41
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 12 reports have described EUS-FNA for biliary disease. Table 4 shows an overview of EUS-FNA for the biliary tract [Frischer-Ravens et al 2000Rösch et al 2004, Lee et al 2004Eloubeidi et al 2004;Byrne et al 2004;Meara et al 2006;DeWitt et al 2006;Mohamadnejad et al 2011;Ohshima et al 2011;Nayar et al 2011;Weilert et al 2014]. According to those reports, sensitivity and accuracy have been widely reported as 43-100% and 54-100%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, only 12 reports have described EUS-FNA for biliary disease. Table 4 shows an overview of EUS-FNA for the biliary tract [Frischer-Ravens et al 2000Rösch et al 2004, Lee et al 2004Eloubeidi et al 2004;Byrne et al 2004;Meara et al 2006;DeWitt et al 2006;Mohamadnejad et al 2011;Ohshima et al 2011;Nayar et al 2011;Weilert et al 2014]. According to those reports, sensitivity and accuracy have been widely reported as 43-100% and 54-100%, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with ERCP, EUS-FNA offers high diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy for pancreatic tumors, as well as a low risk of adverse events. However, only a few reports have described EUS-FNA for biliary lesions [FrischerRavens et al 2000[FrischerRavens et al , 2004Rösch et al 2004;Lee et al 2004;Eloubeidi et al 2004;Byrne et al 2004;Meara et al 2006;DeWitt et al 2006;Mohamadnejad et al 2011;Ohshima et al 2011;Nayar et al 2011;Weilert et al 2014]. In addition, most of those reports examined results of EUS-FNA in cases that could not be diagnosed using ERCP.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only condition (either in patients with or without PSC) that does not require histological confirmation is biliary stricture associated with perihilar mass, hypertrophy-atrophy complex and vascular encasement, but this presentation is very rare. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration demonstrated a good diagnostic performance for discriminating benign versus malignant biliary strictures and without apparent risk of tumour seeding linked with the procedure [218][219][220][221][222] . As for iCCA, the risk of tumour seeding after transperitoneal biopsy of pCCA is based on limited evidence 223 .…”
Section: Clinical Presentation and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors reported a diagnostic sensitivity of 86%. However, another group reported lower rates of diagnostic sensitivity (45%) for detection of bile duct lesions by using ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration [51] . EUS-FNA may represent an alternative approach in the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, especially in patients with negative brush cytology and forceps biopsy findings.…”
Section: Eus Guided Fine-needle Aspirationmentioning
confidence: 99%