2022
DOI: 10.1055/a-1784-0166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield of upper gastrointestinal screening in colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology: a multicenter study

Abstract: Background and study aims The majority of patients with 10 or more cumulative colorectal adenomas have uninformative genetic testing and meet criteria for colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology (CPUE). The yield of upper gastrointestinal screening in patients with CPUE after multi-gene panel testing is unknown and our objective was to characterize this. Patient and methods A multicenter, retrospective analysis of screening upper endoscopies in adults with CPUE after multi-gene panel testi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 118 Furthermore, a recent multicenter study highlighted that 7% of patients with CPUE had evidence of upper GI neoplasia on an index endoscopy, highlighting that consideration of upper GI surveillance should be made in these individuals. 119 Given limited data the absolute risk of gastric cancer in CPUE remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 118 Furthermore, a recent multicenter study highlighted that 7% of patients with CPUE had evidence of upper GI neoplasia on an index endoscopy, highlighting that consideration of upper GI surveillance should be made in these individuals. 119 Given limited data the absolute risk of gastric cancer in CPUE remains uncertain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as noted above, the authors did not note any difference in the rate of gastric adenomas, duodenal adenomas or ampullary adenomas in patients with 10 to 19 colorectal adenomas compared with those with 20 to 99 adenomas. There is a similar lack of distinction in other CPUE cohorts receiving upper endoscopy 9,10 . This likely relates to the cumulative number of colorectal adenomas being a fluid number that has more to do with the point in time when a clinician or researcher interacts with a patient and how closely they adhere to recommended colonoscopy intervals than a true phenotypic distinction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is important to consider the naming convention used to describe colonic polyposis in the setting of negative germline genetic testing. Hajj Ali and colleagues use CPUE to define this condition; however, the citations referenced in their article include a myriad of different terminology for this syndrome, including “colonic adenomatous polyposis of unknown etiology,” “colonic oligopolyposis of unknown etiology,” and “multiple colorectal adenomas without germline APC or MUTYH mutations.” 9,10,12,13 These varied names are all limited and ungainly and likely lead to both decreased awareness by providers and a lack of focus in the scientific literature. Furthermore, all of these naming conventions focus on the colonic manifestations and do not recognize the important extracolonic findings now associated with this syndrome.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,6 The risk of extra-colonic manifestations, including gastroduodenal neoplasia and thyroid cancer, is well established among patients with FAP, but limited data exists on the prevalence of upper gastrointestinal neoplasia in CPUE. 1,[7][8][9] While NCCN recommends patients with ≥ 100 cumulative lifetime colorectal adenomas be surveilled similarly to patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), 5 they recently added a "consideration" for a baseline esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with visualization of the papilla for patients with 20 to 99 colorectal adenomas and remained silent in regard to thyroid ultrasound surveillance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%