2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1516-89132010000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield response to fertilization strategies in no-tillage soybean, corn and common bean crops

Abstract: ABSTRACT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
11
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the application of fertilizers for soybean, corn and common bean in the established no-tillage system and with high P content and medium K content can be performed independent of the localization (furrow or total area) and period (winter and summer). Even with medium K content, there is no need to apply fertilizers in the sowing furrow, not even the presence of this nutrient in the furrow interferes negatively on the yields of corn, common bean and soybean (PAULETTI et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the application of fertilizers for soybean, corn and common bean in the established no-tillage system and with high P content and medium K content can be performed independent of the localization (furrow or total area) and period (winter and summer). Even with medium K content, there is no need to apply fertilizers in the sowing furrow, not even the presence of this nutrient in the furrow interferes negatively on the yields of corn, common bean and soybean (PAULETTI et al, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maize yields during the first year were higher than those described by Santos et al (2007), who reported the production of 7043 kg ha -1 for maize strain AG 1051, and 6865 kg ha -1 for AG 9010, when all nitrogen (120 kg ha -1 ) was applied during the sowing. However, the maize yield found by Pauletti et al (2010) varied from 7.328 to 10450 to maize fertilized with NP 2 O 5 K 2 O (30-60-60) and 90 kg ha -1 of N at top dressing. In the second year just as the first, the chlorophyll reading ( Figure 2B) followed maize yield and was higher in the treatments that received all N during the planting, 24-120-0 (4420 kg ha -1 ), with all N in topdressing, 24-0-120 (4324 kg ha -1 ), and when N was parceled during the planting and in topdressing, 24-40-80 (4344 kg ha -1 ), agreeing with Bertolini et al (2008).…”
Section: Relationship Between Nitrogen Management With Chlorophyll Comentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Corroborando com esses resultados, Pauletti et al (2010) também não observaram efeito da aplicação de P na altura de inserção de espigas em plantas de milho. Sarker, Karmoker e Rashid (2010), afirmam que a deficiência de P prejudica a formação do colmo em plantas de milho, resultando em diâmetros menores.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified