2006
DOI: 10.1017/s002211200600200x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yield stress effects on Rayleigh–Bénard convection

Abstract: We examine the effects of a fluid yield stress on the classical Rayleigh–Bénard instability between heated parallel plates. The focus is on a qualitative characterization of these flows, by theoretical and computational means. In contrast to Newtonian fluids, we show that these flows are linearly stable at all Rayleigh numbers, ${\hbox{{\it Ra}}$, although the usual linear modal stability analysis cannot be performed. Below the critical Rayleigh number for energy stability of a Newtonian fluid, ${\hbox{{\it Ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
79
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
3
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, computational viscoplasticity seems to have reached a turning point where, the basic computational methods being well understood (despite the fact that there is still room for progress for incompressible single-phase flows, such as speeding up the convergence of the solution algorithms), many practitioners are eager to consider more complex and realistic situations. In that direction, let us mention Mitsoulis, Abdali and Markatos [1993], Zenaidi [1998], Nouar, Benaouda-Zouaoui andDesaubry [2000], Vinay, Wachs and Agassant [2005], Zhang, Vola and Frigaard [2006] for flow with heat transfer; Dimakopoulos and Tsamopoulos [2003], Vola, Babik and Latché [2004] for free surface flows; Davidson, Nguyen, Chang and Ronningsen [2004], Vinay, Wachs and Agassant [2006] for compressible flows; and Dean, Glowinski and Pan [2003], Yu and Wachs [2007] for particulate flows.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Computational Viscoplasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, computational viscoplasticity seems to have reached a turning point where, the basic computational methods being well understood (despite the fact that there is still room for progress for incompressible single-phase flows, such as speeding up the convergence of the solution algorithms), many practitioners are eager to consider more complex and realistic situations. In that direction, let us mention Mitsoulis, Abdali and Markatos [1993], Zenaidi [1998], Nouar, Benaouda-Zouaoui andDesaubry [2000], Vinay, Wachs and Agassant [2005], Zhang, Vola and Frigaard [2006] for flow with heat transfer; Dimakopoulos and Tsamopoulos [2003], Vola, Babik and Latché [2004] for free surface flows; Davidson, Nguyen, Chang and Ronningsen [2004], Vinay, Wachs and Agassant [2006] for compressible flows; and Dean, Glowinski and Pan [2003], Yu and Wachs [2007] for particulate flows.…”
Section: A Brief History Of Computational Viscoplasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to that, it is particularly suitable, from a scientific point of view, for studying and understanding dynamic instability, bifurcation, or chaotic behavior in fluids. The research undertaken in this area, which is of experimental, numerical, or theoretical nature, covers both Newtonian [2,3] and non-Newtonian [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] fluids, but with an abundance of works for the former although the latter are frequently encountered in the engineering practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important computation issue is the accurate tracking of the yield surfaces. Compared to the regularization method, the augmented Lagrangian method yields superior results regarding the location of the yield surface and explorations of the plastic limit, for example, in simulation of the flow cessation [38], [41] or no-flow limit [35]. According to [30], "pragmatically, the choice between augmented Lagrangian and regularization is related to whether one needs to determine the position of the yield surface, or whether a reasonable approximation to the velocity field is sufficient".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%