2006
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.96.138302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yielding and Flow in Adhesive and Nonadhesive Concentrated Emulsions

Abstract: The nonlinear rheological response of soft glassy materials is addressed experimentally by focusing on concentrated emulsions where interdroplet attraction is tuned through varying the surfactant content. Velocity profiles are recorded using ultrasonic velocimetry simultaneously to global rheological data in the Couette geometry. Our data show that non-adhesive and adhesive emulsions have radically different flow behaviors in the vicinity of yielding: while the flow remains homogeneous in the non-adhesive emul… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

15
218
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 207 publications
(238 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
15
218
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-homogeneous flow, often discussed in terms of "shear banding" or "jammingunjamming transitions", attracted researchers' attention in several areas, because it appears as a generic phenomenon in various systems, such as glassy and granular materials, concentrated suspensions, foams, emulsions, and micellar solutions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This phenomenon is still poorly understood and appropriate theoretical modeling, beyond the phenomenological description, is missing.…”
Section: Pacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Non-homogeneous flow, often discussed in terms of "shear banding" or "jammingunjamming transitions", attracted researchers' attention in several areas, because it appears as a generic phenomenon in various systems, such as glassy and granular materials, concentrated suspensions, foams, emulsions, and micellar solutions [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. This phenomenon is still poorly understood and appropriate theoretical modeling, beyond the phenomenological description, is missing.…”
Section: Pacsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that no quantitative agreement is expected for these data: For the large bubbles studied in [8], gravity is expected to accelerate film thinning, thus leading to higher experimental critical rates. On the other side, the extremely small size of the emulsion drops studied in [10] corresponds to very fast film thinning, see Eq.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second class of materials is characterized by flow curves that exhibit a minimum, indicating an instability of homogeneous flow in the region where dσ /dγ < 0, and leading to heterogeneous flow in the form of shear bands 1 . These two classes have been distinguished in several recent works as "simple" fluids without shear banding behaviour and "thixotropic" fluids, that phase separate in a solid and a fluid phase [2][3][4][5] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Owing to their larger sizes and slower relaxation times when compared to, say, atomic fluids, the structure, dynamics and mechanical response of soft materials can be studied experimentally by common laboratory techniques such as microscopy, light scattering and rheology. The interaction between the individual constituents of soft materials can be tuned easily [17] and this feature is exploited for example in the verification of the predictions of the MCT for repulsive and attractive colloidal glasses [18,19]. For a more complete discussion, we would like to refer the readers to a recent review article by Cipelletti and Ramos [20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%