1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01413406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yields and recoil properties of products from the reaction between natural copper and 86 MeV/A12C ions

Abstract: Absolute cross sections and thick target/thick catcher recoil properties have been determined for radionuclides produced in the reaction between copper and 86 MeV/A ~2C ions. Integration of the obtained mass yield curve gives a cross section of reactions leading to spallation products of 1,440 mb.The F/B-ratios are found to increase with decreasing product mass, reaching a maximum of ~ 100 for products with masses 20-25 mass units lower than the target mass, followed by a decrease. The recoil data have been an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1983
1983
1984
1984

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In such a way, as examples at= 1.7 barns for a 89y target and O-r=2.1 barns for a natural silver target with an error of 15 to 20 ~o. The thick target between thick catchers technique has not been used for the natural Cu target; nevertheless, summing partial cross-sections in thin catchers and in target, an estimation of the total cross-section has been made in order to compare the results with the measurement performed by Lund and coworkers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The two different experiments appear in quite good agreement, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Projected Ranges and Mean Recoil Energy Of Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a way, as examples at= 1.7 barns for a 89y target and O-r=2.1 barns for a natural silver target with an error of 15 to 20 ~o. The thick target between thick catchers technique has not been used for the natural Cu target; nevertheless, summing partial cross-sections in thin catchers and in target, an estimation of the total cross-section has been made in order to compare the results with the measurement performed by Lund and coworkers [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. The two different experiments appear in quite good agreement, as indicated in Table 1.…”
Section: Projected Ranges and Mean Recoil Energy Of Residuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with the findings of Cumming et al [17J, who bombarded Cu target with different projectiles and showed that the velocity vll(/~ll ) plotted versus the projectile velocity (rapidity) for a given isotope fall on a common smooth curve. However, by extracting v ll from the VcN same data, this appears to be a smooth function of 0,4 the projectile total kinetic energy, as we pointed out 0,3 in an earlier paper [11]. The vii for products far from the target is signi-0,2 ficantly lower for 86 MeV/A aHe induced reactions than for the corresponding 86 MeV/A ~2C reactions.…”
Section: )Cnmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It became possible to study nuclear interactions with heavy ions at intermediate velocities and thus to learn about the transitions between slow (< 10 MeV/A) and relativistic heavy ions. Some of the results obtained have been published [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. A more or less complete * Present address: CERN, Geneva, Switzerland picture of the systematic dependence on the projectile type, projectile energy, target and product mass is taking form.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations