You are simply not funny: Development and validation of a scale to measure failed humor in leadership

Abstract

Research has recently established the notion that humor in leadership contributes to the development of a positive professional relationship between leaders and followers. This relationship has been supposed to be the core mechanism via which humor in leadership unfolds its effects on work attitudes and behaviors. However, research has neglected the option that humor used by leaders might fail to amuse their followers. In this study, we investigate the role of failed humor for the relationship between leader and follower. More concretely, we develop a new scale for measuring failed humor in leadership and demonstrate its factorial and criterion-related validity. Using an automated item selection algorithm, we optimized the newly developed scale and derived a well-fitting six-item scale out of a pool of 12 items. In a study based on a sample of 385 employees, we were able to show that our newly developed scale is factorially valid. Moreover, we showed a negative correlation between failed humor and leader-member exchange. Furthermore, we showed incremental validity of failed humor in that failed humor predicted variance in leader-member exchange beyond well-established humor constructs such as affiliative and aggressive humor. Our study contributes to the development of the field of humor in leadership and opens up new options for further inquiry. Moreover, our study demonstrates the use of automated item selection algorithms in the applied field.

Establishing circularity: development and validation of the circular work value scale (CWVS)

“…Due to current debates on validity concerns of measures in psychological science (Flake et al, 2017;Hussey and Hughes, 2020;Shaw et al, 2020) and the need for short questionnaires (Fuchs and Diamantopoulos, 2009), the data will be analyzed with ABIS using a genetic algorithm. In the field of psychological assessment, algorithms are increasingly used in item selection and questionnaire development (Algner and Lorenz, 2022;Kerber et al, 2022;Pundt et al, 2022). Compared to classical approaches, algorithms have the advantage of being more objective and efficient with respect to defined criteria to find a (nearly) finite solution (Leite et al, 2008;Olaru et al, 2015).…”

Humor in professional coaching: a literature review and research agenda

“…In the case of leaders, this refers to instances where a leader’s humor fails to amuse their followers. Failed humor can also undermine the relationship as is known from organizational literature ( Pundt et al, 2022 ). To enhance coaches’ understanding of navigating failed humor they must be careful if mental conditions like autism or borderline are suspected, aware of the cultural background, and avoid forced humor ( Hussong and Micucci, 2020 ).…”