Background: People with dementia in acute hospitals do not routinely receive best care. The Irish National Audit of Dementia was undertaken to improve care and is based upon the English National Audit of Dementia. Audit and feedback is an effective intervention, but there is variation in the extent to which it improves care. Increasing the quality improvement capabilities of feedback recipients may lead to greater improvements in care. We sought to adapt an existing quality improvement collaborative, to support the improvement capabilities of National Audit feedback recipients, to the Irish context. The study aimed to co-design adaptations to reflect contextual differences between the English and the Irish healthcare system and to explore fidelity, affective response, and reported appropriateness, burden and effectiveness of the adapted Quality Improvement Collaborative in Ireland.
Methods: We used co-design methods involving dementia clinicians from three hospitals (n=7) and interviews with healthcare workers from seven hospitals (n=8) to adapt and explore implementation of the intervention.
Results: The intervention required adaptation to reflect differences in: engagement, working patterns, terminology, the actors involved and organisational structure. There was evidence that the adapted intervention generated a positive affective response, was perceived as effective and appropriate and led to fidelity of receipt and enactment.
Conclusion: We describe implications for the adaptation of interventions to increase participants’ quality improvement capabilities and highlight the importance of socio-adaptive work. We distinguish between adaptation and forms of tailoring. We propose further work to explore antecedents of senior positional leader engagement, to describe the delivery of intra-group behaviour change techniques and to adapt the intervention to other clinical domains.