“You can’t bully me anymore”: Coping strategies in a group of psychologists accused of professional misconduct

Kirkcaldy, Hanlé; Rensburg, Esmé van; Plooy, Kobus Du

doi:10.1080/14330237.2020.1767949

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The larger study set out to explore and elicit the claims and concerns of practitioners subjected to a malpractice process and to make sense of their experience by interpreting their individual accounts, exploring their coping strategies and the meanings made from this experience. We report on the coping strategies elsewhere (Kirkcaldy, Van Rensburg & Du Plooy 2020 ). However, it was found that practitioners not only reported on their personal emotional and physical experiences, how they coped and the subsequent growth they experienced, but also used the interviews as an opportunity to voice their experience of and relationship to the regulatory body during complaint management (Kirkcaldy, 2020 ).…”

Section: Research Methods and Study Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychologists’ experience of a malpractice complaint: Their relationship with and processes at the regulator

Kirkcaldy

Rensburg

Plooy

2020

Health SA Gesondheid

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Professional malpractice complaints in the South African health arena have increased over the last decade. There is a lack of research on how South African health practitioners experience professional malpractice complaints and complaint processes.Aim: This article reports on one aspect of the findings in a more extensive study relating to the complaint experience of psychology practitioners, namely how a group of psychology practitioners experienced their relationship with and the processes at the regulator during a malpractice complaint. The regulator refers to the professional registration body which manages complaints against practitioners.Setting: The study included 10 registered South African psychologists who experienced a malpractice complaint.Methods: After sampling, semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio-recorded and transcribed. The data were managed using interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) to elicit the personal, subjective experience of the individual participants.Findings: Two superordinate themes and related subthemes emerged from the analysis. First, relating to the experience of the complaint procedures and processes, participants experienced an extended timeframe for complaint management, a lack of communication during complaint management, legal challenges during some disciplinary proceedings and some complaints as unjustified and frivolous. Second, participants were unsure of their relationship with the regulator. Their responses denoted instances of vulnerability and inequality during proceedings.Conclusions: The findings call for closer collaboration between the registration body and practitioners during complaints management, to eliminate vexatious complaints, to streamline processes and to encourage guidance of and support for the professional.

show abstract

Section: Research Methods and Study Designmentioning

confidence: 99%