2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

You can’t teach understanding, you construct it: Applying social network analysis to organizational learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing papers pay much attention to RE [12]. Drawing on Social Network eory [54][55][56][57], this study explains and verifies the mediating mechanism of OLC on the relationship between RE and the IPFLS and explores how RE promotes the IPFLS by improving OLC (see Figure 2). Based on Social Network eory and Organizational Learning eory [19], this research analyzes the relationships among three variables (RE, OLC, and IPFLS) and presents four research hypotheses.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Existing papers pay much attention to RE [12]. Drawing on Social Network eory [54][55][56][57], this study explains and verifies the mediating mechanism of OLC on the relationship between RE and the IPFLS and explores how RE promotes the IPFLS by improving OLC (see Figure 2). Based on Social Network eory and Organizational Learning eory [19], this research analyzes the relationships among three variables (RE, OLC, and IPFLS) and presents four research hypotheses.…”
Section: Theoretical Model and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…e connection between firms and external partners brings relationship rent and competitive advantages to firms [56]. e embedded features of firms in the logistics network not only affect the acquisition and use of resources but also affect their behavior and finally bring about the difference of performance and competitive advantages between firms [57]. According to Relational Embedding eory, interorganizational relational embedding has the essence of trust [10].…”
Section: E Relationship Between Re and Ipflsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the publication of the book "Who Shall Survive" by the Romanian-American psychiatrist, psychosociologist, and educator Jacob Levy Moreno in 1934, research and development in the field of social network analysis has been exponentially increasing in a wide range of different areas [43][44][45][46][47][48][49]. It spans social and behavioral sciences [50], agriculture [51] health care [52] environment [53], law, national safety, criminology and terrorism [54], political science [55], organizational science industry, management and leadership [56], communication, and learning and media [57], just to name a few.…”
Section: History and Evolution Of Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although learning is essentially individual, it occurs collectively in the organization (Nonaka & Takeuchi, 1996). Moreover, it is considered by many to be a social process (Bawden & Zuber-Skerritt, 2002;Simon, 1991;Von Kutzschenbach & Brønn, 2010). It can be argued that a theory to analyze learning in the context of IT Governance should include an individual (e.g., explicit knowledge of corporate executives related to IT Governance practices), group (e.g., decision making amongst corporate executives), and organizational level (e.g., embedding learning in an IT Governance architecture).…”
Section: Organizational Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%