2007
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2007.tb00444.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

You Cannot Go Home Again: A Phenomenological Investigation of Returning to the Sojourn Country After Studying Abroad

Abstract: The goal of the present study was to describe the structure of the experience of individuals who returned home after studying abroad, became disillusioned with their home country, and returned to their sojourn country. Phenomenological interviews were conducted with participants. The emerging bipolar themes of conflict/peace, reality/idealization, freedom/restriction, changing/static, and comfort/discomfort were grounded in the theme of cultural comparison. Implications for counseling those who study abroad ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
47
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The pre-determinant for these challenging experiences was invariably change. 'Change' related at a cognitive level to: expectations (realistic or unrealistic, fulfilled or unfulfilled) (see, for example, Burgoon and Walther, 1990); identity (the link between self and other as well as individual and collective) (see, for example, Adler, 1975;Tajfel, 1978;Triandis, 1989); and values (both conscious and unconscious, reconciled and unreconciled) (see, for example, Christofi & Thompson, 2007). At a behavioural level this 'change' related to personal and professional skills and communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pre-determinant for these challenging experiences was invariably change. 'Change' related at a cognitive level to: expectations (realistic or unrealistic, fulfilled or unfulfilled) (see, for example, Burgoon and Walther, 1990); identity (the link between self and other as well as individual and collective) (see, for example, Adler, 1975;Tajfel, 1978;Triandis, 1989); and values (both conscious and unconscious, reconciled and unreconciled) (see, for example, Christofi & Thompson, 2007). At a behavioural level this 'change' related to personal and professional skills and communication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[60][61][62][63] Thompson and Christofi combined Piaget's theory of equilibrium and Adler's re-acculturation coping styles to explain how a student struggles to adjust to their new environment when going abroad and upon return. [64][65][66] They described how a student's struggle results in a cognitive unbalancing (disequilibrium) in the student where their natural tendency to organize and adjust is activated and they learn to accommodate (rework) their understanding of themselves, others, and their environment in such a way that they are able to regain their balance (equilibrium) and adapt. [67] During this process, a student who possesses the characteristics of optimism and "proactive coping" is more likely to experience positive change and transform as opposed to a student who focuses on feelings of rejection and rebelliousness.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obstacles to growth and transformation before, during and after return that thwart student success are at times glaringly evident, and at other times become apparent when reading between the lines. For example, there are numerous articles describing the negative impact of culture shock, [13][14][15][16] reentry or reverse culture shock, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] and evidence of maladjustment even years after students return. [26][27][28][29][30][31] These negative outcomes, have at times shackled students personally and professionally, depriving them of the full benefit of studying abroad that they sought when they applied to go abroad.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This often raises the notion of the professionalisation of the gap year, whereby experiences from travel help to build skills to enable young people to compete better in the market place (Simpson 2005;Lyons et al 2012). A gap year can encourage global citizenry, broaden the mind (Simpson 2005), promote the discovery of cross-cultural experiences to help build the travellers identity (Jones 2005;Hirschorn and Hefferon 2013), autonomy (Brown 2009;Christofi and Thompson 2007), self-efficiency (Cushner and Karim 2004), time satisfaction (Elsrud 1998;Montuori and Fahim 2004) and creativity (Maddux and Galinsky 2009). It can also serve as a way to discover the self and develop interests and ambitions, values and strengths (Lyons et al 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%