2019
DOI: 10.1080/07268602.2019.1620682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘You Don’t Have to Say Anything’: Modality and Consequences in Conversations About the Right to Silence in the Northern Territory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From another experiment it is examined the efficacy of the common cues (i.e. objects, acts, and words of influence) in the creation of individual memory, Bowen (2019). By analyzing how memory is developed, Walters and Cassel (2016) found no association between cognitive processes and the intensity of memory of the individual.…”
Section: Characteristic Tourism Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…From another experiment it is examined the efficacy of the common cues (i.e. objects, acts, and words of influence) in the creation of individual memory, Bowen (2019). By analyzing how memory is developed, Walters and Cassel (2016) found no association between cognitive processes and the intensity of memory of the individual.…”
Section: Characteristic Tourism Experiencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves open the question of how to unambiguously produce 'not have to' readings in Pintupi-Luritja. Bowen (2019) details the evidence for and consequences of misunderstandings of this sort in legal contexts in the Northern Territory. That kind of work shows the importance of a detailed understanding of modal expression in these kinds of linguistic environments, including traditional languages.…”
Section: Negation and The Purposive Suffixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to second language (L2) speakers, the prevailing assumption is that they are wellserved by existing procedures: those who do not understand the language in question get an interpreter, and those who do comprehend the warnings. Recent studies contradict these assumptions and show that many L2 users fall into a grey area: able to communicate on a variety of everyday subjects, they lack the background knowledge and language skills to understand their rights and the consequences of waiving them (Bowen 2019;Eades 2018;Innes and Erlam 2018;Pavlenko, Hepford and Jarvis 2019). This research, however, has been limited to English-speaking countries that rely on scripted rights.…”
Section: Securingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Firstly, they do not tell us anything about understanding of unscripted rights; and, secondly, they treat comprehension as a solitary pursuit. Studies of communication of rights in police interviews remind us that understanding is a joint discursive accomplishment that relies on verbal and non-verbal strategies and cues (Berk-Seligson 2002Bowen 2019;Eades 2018;Ehrlich, Eades and Ainsworth 2016;Heydon 2005;Pavlenko 2008;Rock 2007Rock , 2016. What makes this accomplishment challenging is the power asymmetry: investigators control the timing and the mode of the delivery of the rights, while suspects follow -or, for that matter, fail to follow -suit.…”
Section: Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Approaches To The Study...mentioning
confidence: 99%