Young adult’s perception towards the formation of stigma on people experiencing mental health conditions: A descriptive qualitative study

Abstract

Perpetuated by negative perceptions of mental illnesses, mental health has remained a taboo subject in Asia. This in turn leads to perceived discrimination among people experiencing mental health conditions, due to which they become withdrawn and secretive, making it more challenging for them to seek help. Studies have explored possible reasons affecting societal perception of those with such conditions. The results, however, have been inconclusive on how young adults would perceive them. Through a qualitative descriptive approach and one‐to‐one interviews, this study explored societal perception towards people experiencing mental health conditions in Singapore by involving 22 adults aged 21 to 29 residing locally. The interviews were conducted with a semi‐structured question guide developed through a literature review. Data were analysed through Braun and Clark’s six‐step thematic analysis. The results reveal three distinctive themes that have influenced such societal perception: (i) how views are formed; (ii) the illness does not represent the person; and (iii) complex experiences of family and loved ones. The holistic analysis herein enriches the current understanding of societal perceptions on how stigma is formed towards people experiencing mental health conditions. This would equip mental health professionals with the necessary information in devising measures to reduce stigmatization. Furthermore, families, employers, and students who constitute the future generation should be more engaged in this process, since a more tolerant and less discriminatory society will mean fewer obstacles for those with such conditions when attempting to reintegrate into the society. The study followed the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies 32‐item checklist.

Effects of online stigma‐reduction programme for people experiencing mental health conditions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

“…The dearth of research comparing online and non‐online public stigma interventions in conjunction with the missing summary data for multiple secondary outcomes prevented further conclusive remarks regarding the effectiveness of online and face‐to‐face interventions. However, our findings suggest that the online interventions afforded public stigma‐reduction effects (Roslee & Goh 2020 ) that may last well beyond their initial completion. This bears critical implications for the future delivery of such interventions: the rapid proliferation of internet users (International Telecommunication Union 2020 ) and the evolving COVID‐19 pandemic may increase the acceptability of online interventions (Wind et al .…”

Community mental health interventions for people with major depressive disorder: A scoping review

“…Thus, to achieve efficacious outcomes, mental healthcare providers have to factor in cultural constructs when designing CMHIs for PMDD. Mirroring these were findings by Roslee and Goh (2021) and by Tucker et al (2011) that positive health behaviours such as adoption of healthy lifestyle, dietary adherence and treatment adherence correlated with person-centred culturally sensitive mental healthcare interventions.…”

Medical students’ perception towards mental health recovery: a descriptive qualitative study

“…On the other hand, mental illnesses were more challenging to define, given their perceived intangible nature and their lack of quantifiable aspects. Accordingly, most of the participants defaulted to biopsychosocial explanations, established diagnostic criteria, or functional impairments as proxies to conceptualise mental illnesses [ 37 ]. These findings were independent of whether a student had completed their psychiatric rotation and had been exposed to people experiencing mental health conditions, indicating the need for a more precise delineation of these closely-related constructs, alongside a greater emphasis on them.…”