2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx335
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young and turbulent: the early life of massive galaxy progenitors

Abstract: We present results from the "Ponos" simulation suite on the early evolution of a massive, M vir (z = 0) = 1.2×1013 M galaxy. At z 6, before feedback from a central supermassive black hole becomes dominant, the main galaxy has a stellar mass ∼ 2 × 10 9 M and a star formation rate ∼ 20 M yr −1 . The galaxy sits near the expected main sequence of starforming galaxies at those redshifts, and resembles moderately star-forming systems observed at z > 5. The high specific star formation rate results in vigorous heati… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 179 publications
(237 reference statements)
4
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We study the evolution of the pairing of MBHs embedded in a starforming main-sequence galaxy at z 7. Our initial conditions are taken from the z = 7.32 snapshot of the high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulation PonosHydro (PH; presented in Fiacconi et al 2017) -the precursor run -to which we add the MBHs, as described in detail in Section 2.2.1. We run our simulation using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics, N-body code GASOLINE2 2 (Stadel 2001;Wadsley, Stadel & Quinn 2004;Wadsley, Keller & Quinn 2017), using a set-up that is virtually identical to the parameters set for the PH run in Fiacconi et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We study the evolution of the pairing of MBHs embedded in a starforming main-sequence galaxy at z 7. Our initial conditions are taken from the z = 7.32 snapshot of the high-resolution cosmological zoom-in simulation PonosHydro (PH; presented in Fiacconi et al 2017) -the precursor run -to which we add the MBHs, as described in detail in Section 2.2.1. We run our simulation using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics, N-body code GASOLINE2 2 (Stadel 2001;Wadsley, Stadel & Quinn 2004;Wadsley, Keller & Quinn 2017), using a set-up that is virtually identical to the parameters set for the PH run in Fiacconi et al (2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To refine the zoom-in region up to the desired resolution, we follow the approach reported in Fiacconi et al (2017):…”
Section: Refinement Strategy For the High-resolution Regionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fiacconi et al (2016b) simulated the assembly of the main progenitor of a z=0 ultra-massive elliptical, and found the progenitor to be disk-dominated, with an exponential brightness profile at z 6 > that had experienced several major mergers at z 9 > . The "survival", or more accurately, the reassembly of the disk after a major merger is feasible, provided the major mergers are sufficiently gas rich (e.g., Hopkins et al 2009).…”
Section: Mass and Size Growth At Z 2 >mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "survival", or more accurately, the reassembly of the disk after a major merger is feasible, provided the major mergers are sufficiently gas rich (e.g., Hopkins et al 2009). Fiacconi et al (2016b) also calculated the Toomre parameter for their simulated disk and found it to be stable against fragmentation for all resolved spatial scales, with the disk supported by a turbulent interstellar medium thought to be due to feedback from star formation. They also predict that gas-rich starforming disks at z 5 > should not host a significant bulge, but rather be built up by mergers occurring at z 2 4 < < (Fiacconi et al 2016a).…”
Section: Mass and Size Growth At Z 2 >mentioning
confidence: 99%