Young consumers’ motivational drivers of brand engagement behavior on social media sites

Abstract

Purpose A comprehensive operational framework is proposed to explain young consumers’ (i.e. generations Y and Z) engagement with brands on social media sites (SMSs). This paper aims to synthesize two motivational theories: uses and gratifications (U&G) theory and the technology acceptance model (TAM). Design/methodology/approach A selective literature review was conducted to examine recent publications related to young consumers’ brand-driven engagement behavior on SMSs in which either TAM or U&G theory was applied. A three-stage method was used: an initial search was followed by vertical and horizontal searches and then a targeted search of scholarly publications. At each stage, the university’s library databases and Google Scholar were searched for relevant, mainly peer-reviewed articles, using appropriate filters and keywords. The articles’ references and the studies that cited those articles were added to the initially identified research pool (vertical search), coupled with publications of a similar nature based on keywords (horizontal search). The final stage, the targeted search, involved identifying and adding specific articles (e.g. literature reviews and integrated models). Findings After a review of a significant number of U&G and TAM studies, similarities and differences of the two theories were identified, and an integrated operational framework was developed. Based on empirical findings of existing U&G and TAM studies, testable propositions were presented. Research limitations/implications The proposed hybrid model and the associated propositions provide a research opportunity to empirically examine how young consumers’ motivational (i.e. motivating and demotivating) drivers, normative influence, perceived value and attitudes (toward brand content and engagement) predict intention or actual brand-related behavior on SMSs. Practical implications Much of current research indicates that generations Y and Z (“digital natives”) spend considerably more time on SMSs than any of the older generations (“digital immigrants”). Thus, brands that aim to target this cohort need to develop successful engagement strategies (e.g. gamification and influencer marketing) on current and emerging SMSs. The suggested conceptualization provides guidelines for companies to effectively use such communication strategies to motivate young people to engage with their brands on sites such as Twitter, Instagram and Facebook. Originality/value A review of TAM research indicates that it lacks rich motivating/demotivating constructs, and thus borrows from other theories to complement this weakness. An examination of U&G frameworks, particularity Ducoffe (1996)-based models, indicates that these frameworks mainly test engagement with social media advertising but seldom other types of brand-driven engagement on SMSs. In addition, many U&G studies focus less than TAM studies do on outcome variables such as behavioral intentions and behavior. Thus, the authors propose a synthesized U&G and TAM framework that mitigates both theories’ weaknesses and builds on their strengths, enriching the growing research on brand-driven engagement behavior via SMSs.

Nonprofits meet millennials: a hybrid approach of uses and gratifications and TAM to identify the drivers of monetary donation intention

“…Her commitment reached US$50,000 before she managed to stop the online pledge drive (Sweeney, 2017). Ducoffe’s extended model can provide a suitable theoretical backdrop for investigating this type of brand engagement (Florenthal, 2019) and answer the question: what will motivate and demotivate millennials to engage with NPOs on various social networking sites?…”

“…As engagement with brands (e.g. charities) on social media is a daily activity of millennials, many researchers have migrated Docuffe and TAM to this domain (Florenthal, 2019; Jin et al , 2017; Kim et al , 2016; Lin and Kim, 2016; Wamba et al , 2017). Such widespread usage provides robust support for marrying the two theories into a hybrid conceptualization (Lim, 2015; Lin et al , 2017; Luo et al , 2006).…”

Unveiling drivers and brand relationship implications of consumer engagement with social media brand posts

“…In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in the phenomenon of consumer engagement in the social media context (Barreto and Ramalho, 2019; Florenthal, 2019). Engaging consumers in the social media setting is important because engaged consumers result in a 30% revenue increase; whereas, the disengaged consumers account for a revenue drop of 14% (Kumar and Pansari, 2016).…”

The influence of electronic word-of-mouth adoption on brand love amongst Generation Z consumers

“…Generation Z consumers tend to trust the expertise of influencers on social media, whose information they perceive as authentic and credible (Duffett 2020;Riivits-Arkonsuo & Leppiman 2015). Prior studies from developed markets report that most Generation Z consumers' purchase decisions are positively influenced by eWOM because of enhanced trust, credibility and authenticity (Bruns 2018;Florenthal 2019;Kowalczyk & Pounders 2016).…”