2015
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1084419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young drivers' responses to anti-speeding advertisements: Comparison of self-report and objective measures of persuasive processing and outcomes

Abstract: White, M. J. (2016). Young drivers' responses to antispeeding advertisements: Comparison of self-report and objective measures of persuasive processing and outcomes. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17 (4), 352-358. Young drivers' responses to antispeeding advertisements: Comparison of self-report and objective measures of persuasive processing and outcomes Abstract OBJECTIVE: Self-report measures are typically used to assess the effectiveness of road safety advertisements. However, psychophysiological measures o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Pearson’s correlation analyses were conducted across all groups together, and within each group individually. Results of the individual group analyses indicated that there were no statistically significant correlations between the one-item self-report fear measure and any of the physiological measures, for any of the threat appeal groups, during the impact point, contrary to findings of previous research [ 50 ].…”
Section: Identifying a Fear-arousing Threat Appeal Messagecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Pearson’s correlation analyses were conducted across all groups together, and within each group individually. Results of the individual group analyses indicated that there were no statistically significant correlations between the one-item self-report fear measure and any of the physiological measures, for any of the threat appeal groups, during the impact point, contrary to findings of previous research [ 50 ].…”
Section: Identifying a Fear-arousing Threat Appeal Messagecontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, social advertisers remain reluctant to apply positive approaches. Fewer examples of positive appeals being applied to address social issues such as alcohol consumption [ 55 ], obesity [ 56 ], the environment [ 52 ] and safe driving behaviors [ 17 ] are evident.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To eliminate such feelings, a viewer is then more likely to contribute to the solution by donating to the charity [ 58 ]. While the use of negative appeals has been found to be effective in multiple contexts, such as healthy eating [ 56 ], moderate alcohol consumption [ 55 ] and safe driving [ 17 ], certain limitations apply. Negative appeals result in developing a coping mechanism such as ignoring the message (i.e., flight) or rejecting the message (i.e., fight), reducing message effectiveness [ 30 , 31 , 59 ].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Self-report surveys have been used in other studies that have applied the SatMDT (e.g., Lewis, Ho, & Lennon, 2016;Lewis, Watson, White, & Elliott, 2013;Rowland, Lewis, & White, 2014). It was beyond the scope of the program of research to employ objective data collection methods that have been used in other studies such as in vehicle devices (e.g., GPS) (Kaye, Lewis, Algie, & White, 2016), simulators (Plant, Irwin, & Chekaluk, 2009) or neurocognitive approaches . Although it is acknowledged that self-report surveys are often subject to selfreport bias and the use of self-report measures for illegal behaviours may have caused some participants to respond according to social desirability (L. Beck & Ajzen, 1991), other studies have shown that self-report measures are able to provide general correspondence with objective measures ).…”
Section: Scope Of the Program Of Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%