2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2011.10.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young modulus and Poisson ratio measurements of TiO2 thin films deposited with Atomic Layer Deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
34
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…24,31 There are however numerous examples of synchrotron based ex situ XRD studies on ALD grown layers. 30,[62][63][64][65][66] This indicates that synchrotron based XRD has several advantages to lab based XRD. The main advantage is the lower detection limit.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24,31 There are however numerous examples of synchrotron based ex situ XRD studies on ALD grown layers. 30,[62][63][64][65][66] This indicates that synchrotron based XRD has several advantages to lab based XRD. The main advantage is the lower detection limit.…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various deposition techniques were used to deposit TiO 2 thin films with reported photocatalytic activity such as sol‐gel, laser ablation, spray pyrolysis, APCVD, magnetron sputtering, electron‐beam evaporation, and atomic layer deposition (ALD) . Among these techniques, APCVD has garnered a greater interest as it can be incorporated into the commercial process for float glass production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figures 3(a) and (b) show the predicted numbers of cracks as a function of ε a at 30 °C, 50% RH, and 80 °C, 90% RH, respectively, for different delamination lengths on each side of the channel cracks, λ . These predicted numbers are based on the linear fits from figure 2(b) and the FEM results [15] (using E = 150 GPa for titania) [28]. These predictions were compared to SEM observations of devices that did not fail during the fatigue tests, from which the number of cracks could be estimated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%