2017
DOI: 10.4324/9781315651446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young Offenders and Open Custody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the heart of this conflict is how youth detention homes use their power. Youth detention homes could be seen to employ power as a corrective technique in order to transform placed youth into docile and productive citizens (Foucault 1979; Pettersson 2017). In Swedish youth detention homes, correctional techniques can be seen in systems of privileges, for example in the use of token economies, whereby privileges are rewarded or taken away, as a form of micro-punishment, in order to manage the behavior of placed youth or teach them proper norms (see Gradin Franzén 2014; Pettersson 2017).…”
Section: Background: Examining (Sport) Pedagogies In Youth Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the heart of this conflict is how youth detention homes use their power. Youth detention homes could be seen to employ power as a corrective technique in order to transform placed youth into docile and productive citizens (Foucault 1979; Pettersson 2017). In Swedish youth detention homes, correctional techniques can be seen in systems of privileges, for example in the use of token economies, whereby privileges are rewarded or taken away, as a form of micro-punishment, in order to manage the behavior of placed youth or teach them proper norms (see Gradin Franzén 2014; Pettersson 2017).…”
Section: Background: Examining (Sport) Pedagogies In Youth Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tight power both fragments the prisoner society, then, and works through it. Tove Pettersson (2017: 89) describes how prison officers in a Swedish open unit for young people imposed small collective punishments to ‘get the youths to steer one another in the direction of good behaviour’. She considers this through a Foucauldian lens and argues that it demonstrates that power becomes ‘invisible’ as the youths take over ‘the disciplinary work of staff’ (p. 90).…”
Section: Literature Review: Penal Power and The Prisoner Societymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research has noted incarcerated youths’ perceptions of powerlessness in relation to staff (see, e.g. Pettersson, 2017; Kivett and Warren, 2002). This is also one of a number of distinguishing characteristics of the total institution (Goffman, 1961).…”
Section: Concluding Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, contributes to a situation where such institutions rarely achieve their rehabilitative goals (Franzén and Holmqvist, 2014: 71). In the context of special approved homes, Pettersson (2017: 88f) has described a process of superficial adaptation, whereby youths adapt themselves to institutional rules and conditions rather than undergoing any ‘real change’.…”
Section: Special Approved Homes As Total Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%