Young people’s views on sharing health-related stories on the Internet

Abstract

There is an increasing interest in the use of stories in healthcare practice and education. However, there are few stories from young people concerning health and little is known about their views on sharing such stories on the Internet. The aim of this study was to explore young people's perspectives in this area. A qualitative method was used and a project website was purposely built to facilitate data collection. An online focus group with 13 young people was carried out in an asynchronous format. Participants valued highly the therapeutic effect of storytelling and the use of digital stories to share feelings and experiences with a wide range of audiences, suggesting that well-produced stories could be a useful learning resource. A number of concerns were also raised, including embarrassment, reaction of other people and online safety. Having stories available on the Internet can be beneficial; however, concerns especially about safety associated with Internet use and support for storytellers should be taken into consideration. A better understanding of young people's perceptions can provide valuable insights for future work with this age group on storytelling.

Communication That Changes Lives: Social Support Within an Online Health Community for ALS

“…Netnography is especially applicable to studying communities that are already operating on the Internet (Kozinets, 2002), as opposed to online communities specifically set up by a research team for the purpose of research (Farnham et al, 2002;Yu, Taverner, & Madden, 2011).…”

Not just another focus group: making the case for the nominal group technique in criminology

“…An advantage of online applications of NGT and of group discussions in general is that they offer anonymity, which has been found to stimulate disclosure in sensitive topics (Tates et al, 2009, Stover & Goodman, 2012. Importantly, the online form can enable researchers to gain access to groups that are difficult to engage via others research methods, in particular young people and vulnerable groups (Stewart & Williams, 2005;Yu et al 2011;Thomas et al 2013). For researchers, the online application saves (travel) expenses and time for transcribing data since the data are already in writing (Tates et al, 2009).…”

Grupos Focais Online e Pesquisa em Psicologia: Revisão de Estudos Empíricos entre 2001 e 2011

“…Kenny (2005), que descreveu um grupo online assíncrono com 38 membros, assinalou que a comunicação assíncrona permitiu que apenas um moderador facilitasse a discussão em um grupo desse tamanho, uma vez que as mensagens não eram envia-das todas no mesmo horário. Lagan et al (2011) (Sharkey et al, 2011;Yu, Taverner, & Madden, 2011).…”

“…Assim, é possível que a maioria dos autores concorde com a observação de que, no modelo assíncrono, um moderador é suficiente, inclusive para grupos numerosos (Kenny, 2005). No entanto, ressalta-se que Yu et al (2011), embora tenham trabalhado com um grupo de 13 pessoas, acreditam que o uso de dois moderadores aumente a capacidade de monitoramento do grupo, permitindo encontrar sinais de desconforto nos participantes -aspecto importante quando a amostra inclui pessoas em situação de vulnerabilidade.…”

“…Embora a falta de interação face a face possa prejudicar o fluxo da discussão e a identificação de emoções (Abreu et al, 2009;Fox et al, 2007b;Yu et al, 2011; entre outros), também tem efeitos positivos. A ausência de pistas, como sinais corporais, típica da maior parte dos grupos analisados, diminui as chances de que os membros do grupo percebam diferenças de status entre si e a desaprovação dos seus comentários (Schneider et al, 2002).…”