2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.physe.2018.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young's moduli of carbon materials investigated by various classical molecular dynamics schemes

Abstract: Background: Classical carbon potentials together with classical molecular dynamics are employed to calculate structures and physical properties of such carbon-based materials where quantum mechanical methods fail either due to the excessive size, irregular structure or long-time dynamics.Examples are given by recently synthesized free-standing carbon nanomembranes (CNM) with molecular thickness and macroscopic lateral size as well as by amorphous carbon.Results: Although such potentials, as for instance implem… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, there is a large dispersion in both experimental and simulation values. Experimental results show Youngʼs modulus in the range 0.5-1.4 TPa, and simulations in the range 0.4-1.5 TPa [22][23][24][25]. Most experiments for pristine, nearly defect-free graphene, give values close to 1 TPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In general, there is a large dispersion in both experimental and simulation values. Experimental results show Youngʼs modulus in the range 0.5-1.4 TPa, and simulations in the range 0.4-1.5 TPa [22][23][24][25]. Most experiments for pristine, nearly defect-free graphene, give values close to 1 TPa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Measurements using atomic force microscope (AFM) nanoindentation [6][7][8] are supported or predicted by theoretical studies done by density functional theory (DFT) calculations [9][10][11] and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] of graphene nanosystems. These studies confirm the high stiffness and strength of this two-dimensional (2D) material.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As a side remark, it can be noted that other choices for the molecular dynamics potentials of the same family include Tersoff 1990 72 , Tersoff 1994 73 and the optimized Tersoff 69 . Previous studies 74 found that the Tersoff 1989 is able to produce the correct graphene structure e.g. carbon-carbon distance in graphene whereas the Tersoff 1990 and Tersoff 1994 models cannot.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%