2022
DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Young’s moduli of subcutaneous tissues and muscles under different loads at the gluteal region calculated using ultrasonography

Abstract: Young's modulus distributions for subcutaneous and muscle tissues in a large sample of healthy individuals, based on ultrasonography and compression testing, remains uninvestigated till date. This study aimed to separately estimate the hardness of subcutaneous tissues and muscles in the human gluteal region under a range of loads in terms of mean Young's moduli and associated distributions. [Participants and Methods] Data of 21 males aged 20-22 years were acquired using synchronous compression testing and ultr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The stress-strain characteristics of the subcutaneous tissue layer, muscle layer, and muscle-nodule-palpation simulator do not deviate significantly from those measured on corresponding examples from living subjects (Fig. 2) 17) . A transparent plastic sheet was attached over the bottom of the muscle-nodule-palpation simulator to maintain the transparency of its bottom surface.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The stress-strain characteristics of the subcutaneous tissue layer, muscle layer, and muscle-nodule-palpation simulator do not deviate significantly from those measured on corresponding examples from living subjects (Fig. 2) 17) . A transparent plastic sheet was attached over the bottom of the muscle-nodule-palpation simulator to maintain the transparency of its bottom surface.…”
Section: Participants and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Through comparison of their Young's moduli (440 kPa compared to 16 GPa), the flesh is more than 10 4 times weaker than the tibia's cortical bone, or the bone analogs used in this experiment 9 . This justifies the choice to ignore the muscles and tendons surrounding the tibia in our payload, as they do not have a significant effect on the strength of the sample.…”
Section: Human Modelmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To simulate the mechanical strength of bone most accurately, the team prioritised a close match on Young's modulus and cortical thickness. Human cortical bone has a Young's modulus of around 16 GPa 9 . Common animal bones have both a larger cortical thickness and a lower Young's modulus compared to humans 10 .…”
Section: Model Development Bone Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%