Your Place or Mine? On the Residence Choice of Young Couples in Norway

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. www.econstor.eu The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. Terms of use: Documents in D I S C U S S I O N P A P E R S E R I E SIZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. Norwegian registry data is used to investigate the location decisions of a full population cohort of young adults as they complete their education, establish separate households and form their own families. We find that the labor market opportunities and family ties of both partners affect these location choices. Surprisingly, married men live significantly closer to their own parents than do married women, even if they have children, and this difference cannot be explained by differences in observed characteristics. The principal source of excess female distance from parents in this population is the relatively low mobility of men without a college degree, particularly in rural areas. Despite evidence that intergenerational resource flows, such as childcare and eldercare, are particularly important between women and their parents, the family connections of husbands appear to dominate the location decisions of less-educated married couples. JEL Classification:J12, J16, J61

The Effects of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skills on Migration Decisions.

“…In addition, Huttunen, Møen, and Salvanes (2018) and Løken, Lommerud, and Lundberg (2013) show that noneconomic factors such as family ties are very important for migration behavior in Norway. Our study uses data with quality comparable to that of Lindqvist and Vestman (2011).…”

Family proximity, childcare, and women’s labor force attachment

“…For example, the percentages of individuals living in their birth state (our proxy for proximity when using census data) has remained fairly constant over the past three decades. 13 Using Norwegian data that provides information on the geographical proximity to both mothers and mothers-in-law, Løken, Lommerud and Lundberg (2013) find that couples live closer to his mother than to hers. They attribute this to the ''relatively low mobility of men who have not attended college, particularly in rural areas.''…”

Patrilocal, Matrilocal or Neolocal? Intergenerational Proximity of Married Couples in China

“…Couples' proximity to each set of parents is thus determined by a complex interplay in which marriage markets, cultural norms, practical considerations and intrahousehold bargaining power all play an important role (Chan & Ermisch, 2015a). Thus far, these studies have been based on data from Western countries, notably the Netherlands (Blaauboer, Mulder, & Zorlu, 2011), Norway (Løken, Lommerud, & Lundberg, 2013), the UK (Chan & Ermisch, 2015a) and the US (Compton & Pollak, 2015).…”