2005
DOI: 10.1007/bf02812227
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youth-adult differences in the demand for unionization: Are American, British, and Canadian workers all that different?

Abstract: This paper examines demand for union membership amongst young workers in Britain, Canada and the United States. The paper benchmarks youth demands for collective representation against those of adult workers and finds that a large a nd significant representation gap exists in all three countries. Using a model of representation advanced by Farber (1982) and Riddell (1993) we find that a majority of the union density differential between young and adult workers is due to supply-side constraints rather than a lo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

10
97
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
10
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probit results reported in column 2 of Table 2 do not include any control variables and show that the average (raw) unionization rate for the two youngest age groups are indeed statistically different from the oldest age group. The union density trend for our single cohort of individuals, then, uncovers a significant youth-adult unionization difference, but compared to the crosssectional results from Bryson et al (2005), in which the unionization rate for workers aged 15-24 is only one-third as high as the unionization rate for those aged 25-65 in the United States, the age-profile in the single NLSY79 cohort flattens out more quickly. Our results are consistent with Blanchflower's (2007) results that also used narrower age categories distinguishing between teenagers and those in their early 20s.…”
Section: The Cohort Effect In Youth-adult Unionization Differencesmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The probit results reported in column 2 of Table 2 do not include any control variables and show that the average (raw) unionization rate for the two youngest age groups are indeed statistically different from the oldest age group. The union density trend for our single cohort of individuals, then, uncovers a significant youth-adult unionization difference, but compared to the crosssectional results from Bryson et al (2005), in which the unionization rate for workers aged 15-24 is only one-third as high as the unionization rate for those aged 25-65 in the United States, the age-profile in the single NLSY79 cohort flattens out more quickly. Our results are consistent with Blanchflower's (2007) results that also used narrower age categories distinguishing between teenagers and those in their early 20s.…”
Section: The Cohort Effect In Youth-adult Unionization Differencesmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Bryson et al (2005), for example, motivate their study of youth-adult differences in unionization by showing that unionization rates for workers aged 25-65 are three times higher than for those aged 15-24 in the United States and Canada, and two times higher in Britain. A similar pattern is evident in New Zealand and other countries (Haynes, Vowles, and Boxall 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from india show a similar curvilinear relationship between age and union membership (Gani, 1996). This convex curvilinear relationship may be explained by the risk-reward trade-off inherent in the decision to join a union (Bryson et al, 2005). Unions present possible rewards in terms of increased wages and benefits, which could be offset by employer resistance to the cost of unionization that could take the form of retribution from employers and work disruptions (e.g., strikes) that could put wages in jeopardy (Allen, 1995;Dickens, 1983).…”
Section: Individual-level Demographic Differencesmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A recent exception is the comparative analysis of youth-adult differences in unionization of American, British and Canadian workers by Bryson et al (2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%