Youth engagement in the YouthCan IMPACT trial

Henderson, Joanna; Hawke, Lisa D.; Relihan, Jacqueline

doi:10.1503/cmaj.180328

Cited by 26 publications

(38 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(12 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Unfortunately, a perceived lack of access to services, long waiting lists and difficulties in interprofessional collaboration hindered integrated Youth Care. When comparing these results to previous findings from studies on integrated care from the perspective of youth, we conclude that there are similarities in themes identified [21][22][23][24]. Both parents and youth stressed the importance of accessible support with minimal waiting times, co-location of services, and engagement in decision making.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

“…Following the principles of Evidence Based Practice to organize high-quality care, it is crucial to combine client perspectives, clinical experiences, and evidence from research [20]. As previous research to youth engagement in the organization and policy of services suggested, it is important to engage children and their families in developing integrated care, since this can increase service uptake, engagement in-, and control over their care process, and satisfaction over services [21][22][23][24]. These studies recommend to organize accessible and welcoming locations with minimal waiting times, where youth feel valued and respected.…”

Section: Research and Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: To provide integrated Youth Care responsive to the needs of families with multiple problems across life domains, it is essential to incorporate parental perspectives into clinical practice. The aim of this study is to advance our understanding of key components of integrated Youth Care from a parental perspective. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were administered to 21 parents of children receiving Youth Care from integrated care teams in the Netherlands. Qualitative content analysis was conducted by means of a grounded theory approach following qualitative reporting guidelines. Results and discussion: Parental perspectives were clustered into six key components: a holistic, family-centred approach; addressing a broad range of needs in a timely manner; shared decision making; interprofessional collaboration; referral; and privacy. Parents emphasized the importance of a tailored, family-centred approach, addressing needs across several life domains, and active participation in their own care process. However, they simultaneously had somewhat opposing expectations regarding these key components, for example, concerning the changing roles of professionals and parents in shared decision making and the value of involving family members in a care process. Professionals should be aware of these opposing expectations by explicitly discussing mutual expectations and changing roles in decision making during a care process. To enable parents to make their own decisions, professionals should transparently propose different options for support guided by an up-to-date care plan.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 60%

Section: Research and Theorymentioning

confidence: 99%

What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The intervention also included a thorough curriculum that was developed and delivered, including a 76-page guidebook 27 (freely available by contacting the research team) and supplementary readings in the form of peer-reviewed manuscripts on the topic. 14,20,25 Following the workshops, attendees were invited to join two mentorship/coaching sessions delivered via webinar at approximately two-month intervals to enhance and sustain their learnings. A one-hour condensed version of the workshop was also provided for those who were not able to attend, in the form of a national webinar; the impacts of the national webinar on attitudes and practice change are not available.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…[21][22][23] They may also look to literature on the importance and value of youth engagement in research. 2,24 Literature describing examples of projects in which youth were engaged 14,17 and some general guidelines 25 are also available. More systematic training opportunities are required, demonstrating how to engage youth in developmentally appropriate ways in complex research projects.…”

Section: Backg Rou N Dmentioning

confidence: 99%

INNOVATE Research: Impact of a workshop to develop researcher capacity to engage youth in research

Hawke

Darnay

Brown

et al. 2020

Health Expectations

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…1) to out-patient hospitalbased psychiatric services, to determine the impact on clinical and functional outcomes, user satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness. The YCI-IYS model is community-based and was co-created with youth, 22 family members, and other stakeholders. It aims to provide accessible, youthfriendly, 23 evidence-informed mental health services, tailored to the needs of individual youth and offered in the context of other health and social services.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Planning to Implementation of the YouthCan IMPACT Project: a Formative Evaluation

Henderson

Hess

Mehra

et al. 2019

J Behav Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In order to improve the youth mental health system, there is an international movement toward developing community-based service hubs that provide integrated, collaborative care to youth. However, the implementation of multisystem collaboration is complex and can be hampered by barriers. This paper presents a formative evaluation of the YouthCan IMPACT integrated youth services project based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to identify facilitators and barriers to successful implementation. Results highlight that previous positive working relationships along with collaborative investment of resources from partnering organizations are essential to implement an integrated youth service model. In addition, it is important that representative members of all key stakeholder groups, including staff, youth, and caregivers, be involved in the development and execution of the project to ensure effective implementation. Attention to the facilitators and barriers to implementation may help teams seeking to implement highly collaborative, integrated models of service delivery for youth in the community.From Planning to Implementation of the YouthCan IMPACT Project HENDERSON ET AL.

show abstract

Youth engagement in the YouthCan IMPACT trial

Cited by 26 publications

References 6 publications

What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care

What Do Parents Expect in the 21st Century? A Qualitative Analysis of Integrated Youth Care

INNOVATE Research: Impact of a workshop to develop researcher capacity to engage youth in research

From Planning to Implementation of the YouthCan IMPACT Project: a Formative Evaluation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About