Youth mobilisations and political generations: young activists in political change movements during and since the twentieth century

Abstract

This paper uses political generations theory to examine the main youth mobilisations during and since the twentieth century: pre-1939 fascist and communist movements; the student movements of the 1960s and 70s; movements that challenged colonial and neo-colonial rulers in less developed countries and young people's involvement in the revolutions that saw the end of communism in East-Central and South-East Europe in 1989. Conclusions from this review of the past are used in considering the likely significance of subsequent outbursts of political activism among young people: the 'colour revolutions' and other instances of youth mobilisation in former Soviet republics and other ex-communist countries; the Arab Spring and the series of movements that have challenged neo-liberalism -Anti-Globalisation, the Indignados and the Occupy movements. The paper notes that youth mobilisations that have led to the formation of new political generations that have changed their countries' politics then transformed the countries have typically extended over several decades, that initially youthful leaders have sometimes been middle-aged or older before achieving political power and that many of their actions on achieving power have been at variance with their youthful ideals. In conclusion, it is argued that it is still too early to tell whether any of the recent youth mobilisations signal the formation of new political generations.

Encountering energy precarity: Geographies of fuel poverty among young adults in the UK

“…Tikka, Kuitunen, and Tynys (2000) argue that students' attitudes towards energy and environmental issues more broadly are widely divergent in line with gender and educational backgrounds, which means that youth cannot be treated as a monolithic category (Evans, 2008). Many young people have been active organisers of, or participants in, various multi-scale political processes (Roberts, 2015;Staeheli, Attoh, & Mitchell, 2013).…”

Young people navigating political engagement through post-war instability and mobility: A case from rural Nepal

“…Many researchers are studying the reasons and the patterns of violence and mobilisation (Fournier, 2015;Hoffman and Jamal, 2012;Roberts, 2015, see overview in: Jeffrey, 2013, and the recent civil war (1996)(1997)(1998)(1999)(2000)(2001)(2002)(2003)(2004)(2005)(2006) in Nepal has similarly spurred research on youth becoming combatants (Hirslund, 2012;International Crisis Group, 2010;Kohrt and Maharjan, 2009;Zharkevich, 2009Zharkevich, , 2013, para-military groups of leading parties (Hachhethu, 2009) or other types of activists (Snellinger, 2005(Snellinger, , 2006(Snellinger, , 2012. Yet, there is a considerable gap, especially in villages, in our understanding of the everyday politics of ordinary 1 youth.…”

Differences and Inequalities in Civic Participation among Bulgarian Youth

“…The protestors claimed inspiration from the 'Arab Spring' -the 2011 revolutions in Tunisia, Egypt and other North African countries, as well as with earlier youth protests such as the student demonstrations in the UK in 2011, Greece in 2008 and France in 2006 which in turn triggered comparisons in the media with the 1974 'Carnation Revolution' in Portugal and the 1968 occupations of the Sorbonne in Paris. Similar historical links were sought after by young people participating in the 'color revolutions' in Ukraine, Georgia and other former Soviet republics in 2004-6, where the identity frames of the movements stressed the commonalities in goals and forms of action with the 'gentle revolutions' in 1989-91 and the upheavals in 1997 in Central and Eastern Europe [24] [25].…”