YouthCHAT as a Primary Care E-Screening Tool for Mental Health Issues Among Te Tai Tokerau Youth: Protocol for a Co-Design Study

Abstract

BackgroundIn New Zealand (NZ), 1 in 4 adolescents is affected by mental health issues (eg, depression and anxiety) and engages in risk behaviors (eg, harmful drinking and substance abuse), with rates among Māori youth being significantly higher. The majority of NZ secondary school students visit their local primary health care providers (PHPs) at least annually, yet most do not seek help for mental health and risk behavior (MHB) concerns. While youth think it acceptable to discuss sensitive issues during a consultation with their PHPs, unless problems are severe, such conversations are not initiated by PHPs. Early intervention for MHB concerns can prevent long-term health and well-being issues. However, this relies on the early identification of developing problems and youth being offered and accepting help. YouthCHAT is an electronic, multi-item screening tool developed in 2016 to assess MHB concerns among youth. YouthCHAT is completed before a consultation with the PHP, who can access a summary report straight away. A help question allows young people to identify issues that need addressing. A resource pack uses stepped care pathways to guide providers to use appropriate brief interventions.ObjectiveThis study aimed to explore the utility, feasibility, and acceptability of YouthCHAT when tailored for use with youth in primary care settings with large Māori populations. Objectives of the study are to evaluate the implementation of YouthCHAT in nurse-led youth clinics, school-based clinics, and general practice in Te Tai Tokerau (Northland, NZ); to develop a framework for the scaling up of YouthCHAT across further settings; to assess health provider and youth acceptability of the tool; to improve screening rates for mental health and help-seeking behavior; to enable early identification of emerging problems; and to improve brief intervention delivery.MethodsUsing a bicultural mixed-methods co-design approach, 3 phases over a 3-year period will provide an iterative evaluation of the utility, feasibility, and acceptability of YouthCHAT, aiming to create a framework for wider-scale rollout and implementation.ResultsRecruitment for the first phase began in September 2018. YouthCHAT was implemented at the first site in October 2018 and is expected to be at a further two sites in late January to early February 2019. The study is due for completion at the end of 2021.ConclusionsYouthCHAT has potential as a user-friendly, time efficient, and culturally safe screening tool for early detection of MHB issues in NZ youth. The resource pack assists the clinician to provide appropriate interventions for emerging and developed youth mental health and lifestyle issues. Involving input from community providers, users, and stakeholders will ensure that modifiable elements of YouthCHAT are tailored to meet the health needs specific to each context and will have a positive influence on future mental, physical, and social outcomes for NZ youth.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/12108

Ensuring patient and public involvement in the transition to AI‐assisted mental health care: A systematic scoping review and agenda for design justice

“… 152 Misplaced trust in technology could lead to people not seeking professional help when they need it. Valuing principles of diversity and inclusion in technology design is important here because the design of digital tools and interventions must be based on a deep knowledge of the subtleties that distinguish between the social and cultural contexts of use, 153 , 154 , 155 which include the environments and infrastructures where people live. 156 , 157 …”

“…Socio-political context (11 articles) Lack of critical and reflective public debate on the broader socio-political context and digital technologies 40,41 New awareness of legal regulations, data risk assessment and PPI 158 Tools that are culturally relevant 153,154 and culturally safe 155 Maintaining public services in the context of growth of commercial/private providers of digital technologies 26,151 Misperceptions that digital technologies replace professional/medical advice or make it unnecessary 152 Looking at the broader contexts/environments of people's lives, for example urban design 156 and access to open spaces 157 Safety and acceptability (21 articles) Lack of safety measures, oversight and scrutiny 56,159 Uncertainty about public acceptability of basing mental health-care interventions upon predictive analytics 160 Uncertainty about how digitally mediated communication might affect trust between patients and mental health professionals 26 Uncertainty about how best to discuss the complexities of data quality, privacy and data protection issues with patients 85,116,161 How to approach informed consent as a dynamic, on-going and relational process, instead of a one-off event 114,[161][162][163] Professional roles and responsibilities for ensuring and communicating data protection safeguards 105,106,111 Variations in public understanding of cybersecurity in relation to mental health data 84 Diversity of patient's attitudes towards sharing mental health data 838560 Digital teaching resources or experiences that hold authenticity and real-world relevance 63,164,165 Strength of public opinion that mental health apps should be developed collaboratively with patients 79…”

“…152 Misplaced trust in technology could lead to people not seeking professional help when they need it. Valuing principles of diversity and inclusion in technology design is important here because the design of digital tools and interventions must be based on a deep knowledge of the subtleties that distinguish between the social and cultural contexts of use, [153][154][155] which include the environments and infrastructures where people live. 156,157 Imagining new digitally enabled contexts for care requires practitioners to have awareness of emerging data/legal regulations, data risk assessment and effective strategies for patient engagement, within a necessary medical-ethical framework for innovation in health-care technology.…”

He awa whiria—A “Braided River”: An Indigenous Māori Approach to Mixed Methods Research

“…For example, as predominantly P akeh a (one of us is of Maori descent) Auckland-based researchers, we partnered with M aori co-investigators to develop and evaluate the implementation of an online mental health and lifestyle screening tool, YouthCHAT (Martel et al, 2019) for predominantly M aori adolescents in Northland, New Zealand. Over the course of the 3-year project, the research partnership worked with end-users (young people, clinical and educational staff) to tailor the tool for their needs.…”

Assessing youth empowerment and co‐design to advance Pasifika health: a qualitative research study in New Zealand

“…The model of co‐design contained five experiential modules, typifying steps to build relationships among community partners, explore the root causes of prediabetes, and ideate, refine and test community health interventions. The model of co‐design was largely informed by existing literature on youth‐based co‐design in health 17,18,20,21 and input from our partners. The key module was titled ‘Gifts + Issue = Change,’ a participatory brainstorming exercise to ideate community and individual strengths (i.e.…”