2019
DOI: 10.1177/0093854819889645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youths’ Facial Appearance Distinguishes Leaders From Followers in Group-Perpetrated Criminal Offenses and Is Associated With Sentencing Outcomes

Abstract: Group-perpetrated crime often involves leaders and followers, but it is not currently understood how peer groups form around leaders during a criminal incident. Impression formation research has shown that specific facial cues are associated with leadership and perceptions of leadership. We extend this research to leadership among group-perpetrated youth crime and examine its role in downstream sentencing outcomes. Study 1 revealed that leaders of groups may be perceived as more dominant than their followers. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 67 publications
(125 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet beyond investigating the impact of race (e.g., Bennett & Plaut, 2017;Burch, 2015), only a few empirical studies have investigated the ways that different aspects of physical appearance might shape decision-making in the justice system (see King & Johnson, 2016;Petersen, 2017). Perhaps most importantly, previous research in this area has focused almost exclusively on adults in the justice system (see Johnson & King, 2017;Sutherland et al, 2020). Considering the long-term ramifications of receiving a juvenile record (Feld, 2017;Ulmer & Laskorunsky, 2016), it is critically important to examine whether facial appearance biases are present when youth are just coming to the attention of the juvenile justice system for the first time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet beyond investigating the impact of race (e.g., Bennett & Plaut, 2017;Burch, 2015), only a few empirical studies have investigated the ways that different aspects of physical appearance might shape decision-making in the justice system (see King & Johnson, 2016;Petersen, 2017). Perhaps most importantly, previous research in this area has focused almost exclusively on adults in the justice system (see Johnson & King, 2017;Sutherland et al, 2020). Considering the long-term ramifications of receiving a juvenile record (Feld, 2017;Ulmer & Laskorunsky, 2016), it is critically important to examine whether facial appearance biases are present when youth are just coming to the attention of the juvenile justice system for the first time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%