2013
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2013.793079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youthscapes: the politics of belonging for ‘Makwerekwere’ youth in South African schools

Abstract: to "welcome" and "include". {110}

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sen's (2000) research on social exclusion has focused on relational features with deprivation of capability among poor people. Recently, such research has been directed towards understanding 6 structural as well as social processes that lead to individuals and groups living on the margins of society (Gingrich, 2008;Vandeyar, 2013). Understanding political engagement based on social exclusion focuses primarily on relational issues and social ties, such as family, friends, local communities, state services and institutions, and more generally the societies to which individuals belong (Bhalla and Lapeyre, 1997).…”
Section: Political Engagement and Social Inclusion And Exclusiona Youmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sen's (2000) research on social exclusion has focused on relational features with deprivation of capability among poor people. Recently, such research has been directed towards understanding 6 structural as well as social processes that lead to individuals and groups living on the margins of society (Gingrich, 2008;Vandeyar, 2013). Understanding political engagement based on social exclusion focuses primarily on relational issues and social ties, such as family, friends, local communities, state services and institutions, and more generally the societies to which individuals belong (Bhalla and Lapeyre, 1997).…”
Section: Political Engagement and Social Inclusion And Exclusiona Youmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, what looks and language do is define who is, or is not, ‘one of us’ – who belongs. That may be who belongs as a teacher at a particular school, in a particular part of South Africa (Davids and Waghid; Vandeyar, 2013) or which students belong in a maths lesson (Naidoo), or at after school language classes (Avery). The latter paper also identified that there is often an unspoken assumption of a hierarchy of learning spaces, in which ‘borrowed’ classroom space is constructed as a place of remedial or undervalued learning work by mother-tongue tutors and their pupils.…”
Section: Why ‘Race’?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of the papers included here have, at their heart, definitions of who belongs and who does not based on how people are classified through what is called ‘race’. Belonging is an important aspect of identity (May, 2013; Vandeyar, 2013; Yuval-Davis, 2011) so race, as with gender, dis/ability and so forth, as a qualifier of belonging, has an important part to play in general well-being and inclusion. This might be seen as being particularly relevant in an educational setting where children and young people are forming their identities.…”
Section: Belonging Categorization and Symbolic Violencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some of which has been expressed in violence against immigrants (Vandeyar, 2010;Vandeyar, 2011;Vandeyar, 2012;Vandeyar, 2013;Vandeyar & Vandeyar, 2012). There is controversy about whether that was xenophobia or racism or neither of that or just competition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%