2015
DOI: 10.4103/1947-2714.161244
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youtube as a source of information on Ebola virus disease

Abstract: Background:The current West Africa epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD), which began from Guinea in December 2013, has been the longest and deadliest Ebola outbreak to date. With the propagation of the internet, public health officials must now compete with other official and unofficial sources of information to get their message out.Aims:This study aimed at critically appraising videos available on one popular internet video site (YouTube) as a source of information for Ebola virus disease (EVD).Materials an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
72
1
7

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
72
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, 15% of PD videos were found to be somewhat useful and only 4% were assessed as providing very useful PD information. This finding is consistent with previous studies examining the quality of YouTube™ videos relating to several medical conditions [7][8][9][10]12]. Personal users uploaded the majority of reviewed videos (66%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overall, 15% of PD videos were found to be somewhat useful and only 4% were assessed as providing very useful PD information. This finding is consistent with previous studies examining the quality of YouTube™ videos relating to several medical conditions [7][8][9][10]12]. Personal users uploaded the majority of reviewed videos (66%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…YouTube™, for example, has been shown to serve as a rather popular and appealing source of freely available information for a variety of emerging (e.g. H1N1 influenza [7] and Ebola virus disease [8]), acute (e.g. nephrolithiasis [9]), and chronic (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 (See Table 3 for a summary of these studies in terms of EID studied, social media studied, theory applied, method used, and major findings.) 13 Biswas, 3 Chew and Eysenbach, 14 Collier et al, 15 Ding and Zhang, 16 Freberg et al, 9 Gao et al, 17 Kim and Liu, 18 Liu and Kim, 19 Luoma-aho et al, 20 Nerlich and Koteyko, 21 Pandey et al, 22 Signorini et al, 23 Tausczik et al, 24 Tirkkonen and Luoma-aho 25 Ebola virus 10 Basch et al, 26 Househ, 27 Lazard et al, 28 Nagpal et al, 29 Odlum and Yoon, 30 Pathak et al, 31 Seltzer et al, 32 Strekalova, 33 Towers et al, 34 Wong et al 35 H7N9 (bird flu/avian flu) 2 Fung et al, 36…”
Section: Approach 1: Assessment Of the Public's Interest And Responsesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, approximately 70%-80% of videos contained useful information (either accurate medical information or outbreak updates) across different EIDs, such as West Nile virus, 38 H1N1, 22 and Ebola. 31 Some studies further examined the types of medical information included in these YouTube videos, such as modes of transmission, screening, treatment, and symptoms. 26,29,38 Very often, these studies tried to establish the relationship between content characteristics and popularity of videos.…”
Section: Approach 3: Accuracy Of Medical Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El estudio demuestra que la mayoría de vídeos de Internet acerca de los cuidados paliativos en el domicilio ha encontrado, en general, resultados similares a los estudios realizados, en el pasado, sobre el papel de las redes sociales, y en particular de YouTube, como fuente de información en salud pública, como el brote epidémico del virus Ébola (19), la gripe H1N1 (20) y la inmunización (21) que se caracterizaron, en general, por una información de pobre calidad o irrelevante, e incluso en ocasiones engañosa, solo algunos vídeos contienen información de alta calidad.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified