2022
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.4100976
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Youtube Tm as an Source of Information in Pediatric Dentistry Education: Reliability and Quality Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous studies on YouTube, we used likes to assess the popularity of the videos, like ratio = likes/views*100, view ratio = number of views/days since upload, and video power index (VPI) = like ratio*view ratio/100. [11,12] This was different from some previous studies, because the number of dislikes was not indicated in Douyin. And thus dislikes were not included in the video evaluation metric in this study.…”
Section: Video Assessmentcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Based on previous studies on YouTube, we used likes to assess the popularity of the videos, like ratio = likes/views*100, view ratio = number of views/days since upload, and video power index (VPI) = like ratio*view ratio/100. [11,12] This was different from some previous studies, because the number of dislikes was not indicated in Douyin. And thus dislikes were not included in the video evaluation metric in this study.…”
Section: Video Assessmentcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Recent significant studies have implemented different strategies to profoundly scrutinize the content and reliability of YouTube videos (Menziletoglu et al., 2020; Özişçi, 2022; Pons‐Fuster et al., 2020). The majority of studies have raised concerned regarding its reliability as a source of health information for the decision‐making process (Smyth et al., 2020; Uzel et al., 2023). The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the information available regarding peri‐implant diseases and conditions on the YouTube website.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%