“…The BLYP functional generally provides a good description of the structural properties of water including O-O interactions, H-bond statistics, angular distributions, coordination numbers, and radial distribution functions when compared with experiments (Gillan et al, 2016;Lin et al, 2012). However, as discussed in our previous studies using the BLYP exchange correlation functional (Mei et al, 2018;Guan et al, 2020), we note that there is a well-known tendency for most functionals, including BLYP, to overstructure liquid water (Lee and Tuckerman, 2006;Lin et al, 2012). For example, Bankura et al (2014) showed that BLYP, like most other functionals, best reproduces the hydrogenbonded network of water at ambient conditions when using an elevated temperature (80 °C in their case), and it could be argued that there is a temperature offset of approximately 50-55 °C between the computed data as compared to the experimental structure of the solvent at room temperature.…”