2019
DOI: 10.1093/ptep/ptz018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yukawa interactions, flavor symmetry, and non-canonical Kähler potential

Abstract: We study the origin of fermion mass hierarchy and flavor mixing in the standard model, paying attention to flavor symmetries and fermion kinetic terms. There is a possibility that the hierarchical flavor structure of quarks and charged leptons originates from non-canonical types of fermion kinetic terms in the presence of flavor symmetric Yukawa interactions. A flavor symmetry can be hidden in the form of non-unitary bases in the standard model. The structure of Kähler potential can become a touchstone of new … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ref. (Kawamura, 2019) explores a scenario where the flavour group G remains unbroken in Yukawa interactions and the breaking is entirely due to kinetic terms. A model-independent discussion for linearly realized flavour symmetries and in the supersymmetric case can be found in ref.…”
Section: Kinetic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. (Kawamura, 2019) explores a scenario where the flavour group G remains unbroken in Yukawa interactions and the breaking is entirely due to kinetic terms. A model-independent discussion for linearly realized flavour symmetries and in the supersymmetric case can be found in ref.…”
Section: Kinetic Termsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fermion bases are chosen such that for right-handed fermions, left-handed leptons and left-handed quarks, h f † h f , h l h l † and huhu † +h d h d † are diagonal, respectively. In this basis, h † h and hh † have the same eigenvalues equal to 2m 2 f /v 2 , where v = 246GeV is the Higgs vacuum expectation value [2][3][4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%