2013
DOI: 10.13114/mjh/201322471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Yükseköğretimde Öğrenci Başarılarının Sınıflandırılmasında Yapay Sinir Ağları ve Lojistik Regresyon Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
4
1
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Günümüzün önemli ve yaygın kullanılan uygulamaları arasında kabul edilen (Deperlioğlu & Köse, 2011;Elmas, 2003, 22;Öztemel, 2003, 13) yapay zekâ bilimi ve özellikle YSA'nın; sınıflama, modelleme, kestirim (tahmin), optimizasyon gibi önemli alanlarda geçerli ve başarılı sonuçlar elde ettiği yapılan çalışmalarla (Toprak, 2017;Tezbaşaran, 2016;Bahadır, 2016;Kuzmanovic, Jevric, Gajic, Kovacevic, Vasiljevic, Kecojevic & İvanovic, 2015;Bou-Rabee, Suliaman, Choe, Han, Saaed & Marati, 2015;Tekin, 2014;Şevik, Aktaş, Özdemir ve Doğan, 2014;Kasaplı, 2014;Rahmani & Aprilianto, 2014;Turhan vd., 2013;Musso, Kyndt, Cascallar & Dochy, 2013;Ötkün ve Karlık, 2013;Ataseven, 2013;Koç, 2012;Çırak, 2012;Tepehan, 2011;Açıkbaş, Kaypmaz ve Söylemez, 2010;Lee, 2010;Burmaoğlu, 2009;Helhel, 2009;Asilkan ve Irmak, 2009;Oladokun vd., 2008;Aslan, 2008;Yılmaz, Güneş ve Aksu, 2007;Caner ve Üstün, 2006;Ocakoğlu, 2006;Erdem ve Uzun, 2005;Naik & Rogathaman, 2004;Çikoğlu, Temurtaş ve Yumurcak, 2004) research to be conducted by selecting specific cases that have specific characteristics and which carry rich information of the desired information depending on the purpose of the study (Büyüköztürk et al, 2014, 90).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Günümüzün önemli ve yaygın kullanılan uygulamaları arasında kabul edilen (Deperlioğlu & Köse, 2011;Elmas, 2003, 22;Öztemel, 2003, 13) yapay zekâ bilimi ve özellikle YSA'nın; sınıflama, modelleme, kestirim (tahmin), optimizasyon gibi önemli alanlarda geçerli ve başarılı sonuçlar elde ettiği yapılan çalışmalarla (Toprak, 2017;Tezbaşaran, 2016;Bahadır, 2016;Kuzmanovic, Jevric, Gajic, Kovacevic, Vasiljevic, Kecojevic & İvanovic, 2015;Bou-Rabee, Suliaman, Choe, Han, Saaed & Marati, 2015;Tekin, 2014;Şevik, Aktaş, Özdemir ve Doğan, 2014;Kasaplı, 2014;Rahmani & Aprilianto, 2014;Turhan vd., 2013;Musso, Kyndt, Cascallar & Dochy, 2013;Ötkün ve Karlık, 2013;Ataseven, 2013;Koç, 2012;Çırak, 2012;Tepehan, 2011;Açıkbaş, Kaypmaz ve Söylemez, 2010;Lee, 2010;Burmaoğlu, 2009;Helhel, 2009;Asilkan ve Irmak, 2009;Oladokun vd., 2008;Aslan, 2008;Yılmaz, Güneş ve Aksu, 2007;Caner ve Üstün, 2006;Ocakoğlu, 2006;Erdem ve Uzun, 2005;Naik & Rogathaman, 2004;Çikoğlu, Temurtaş ve Yumurcak, 2004) research to be conducted by selecting specific cases that have specific characteristics and which carry rich information of the desired information depending on the purpose of the study (Büyüköztürk et al, 2014, 90).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Predict one additional new student's success in future for model, possibility of prediction is determined as 74% with ANN. In a study, multilayered artificial neural network model's correct classification rate was obtained as 70.16% (Cirak & Cokluk, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are employed. Lately, the most preferred analysis technique has been artificial neural networks (Cirak & Cokluk, 2013;Kim, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In classification studies in the field of education, the performance of methods such as decision trees, support vector machines, logistic regression, neural networks, Bayes algorithms, k-nearest neighborhood are examined and compared (e.g., Bahadır, 2013;Barker, Trafalis & Rhoads, 2004;Berens, Schneider, Gortz, Oster, & Burghoff, 2019;Çırak, 2012;Dekker, Pechenizkiy & Vleeshouwers, 2009;Göker, 2012;Hamalainen & Vinni, 2006;Hamalainen & Vinni, 2011;Minaei-Bidgoli, Kashy, Kortemeyer & Punch, 2003;Osmanbegović & Suljić, 2012;Romero, Espejo, Zafra, Romero & Ventura, 2013;Romero, Ventura, Espejo & Hervas, 2008;Shahiri, Husain & Rashid, 2015;Sweeney, Lester, Rangwala, & Johri 2016;Şengür, 2013;Tepehan, 2011;Tezbaşaran, 2016;Tosun, 2007;Yurdakul & Topal, 2015). In addition, methods were compared according to the different number of categories of the dependent variable (Minaei-Bidgoli, Kashy, Kortemeyer & Punch, 2003;Nghe, Janecek & Haddawy, 2007), the data structure (Romero et al, 2008;, amount of missing and noisy data ( Hamalainen & Vinni, 2011) and sample sizes (Hamalainen & Vinni, 2006;2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%