2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Z-number integrated weighted VIKOR technique for hazard prioritization and its application in virtual prototype based EOT crane operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gul et al (2019) presented the application of VIKOR approach doe studying and analyzing the safety risk in mine industry. Bakioglu and Atahan (2020) developed VIKOR approach based framework for evaluating the risk associating with self-driving vehicle Das et al (2020) applied TOPSIS approach within PFMEA approach for prioritizing the failure events of material transfer crane in steel plant. Zolfani et al (2020) proposed logarithmic normalized concept based VIKOR approach for solving the decision problem and compared the ranking results with traditional VIKOR approach for evaluating the effectivity of the proposed novel VIKOR approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gul et al (2019) presented the application of VIKOR approach doe studying and analyzing the safety risk in mine industry. Bakioglu and Atahan (2020) developed VIKOR approach based framework for evaluating the risk associating with self-driving vehicle Das et al (2020) applied TOPSIS approach within PFMEA approach for prioritizing the failure events of material transfer crane in steel plant. Zolfani et al (2020) proposed logarithmic normalized concept based VIKOR approach for solving the decision problem and compared the ranking results with traditional VIKOR approach for evaluating the effectivity of the proposed novel VIKOR approach.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the studies on Z-number can be classified into three major groups: (i) fundamental theories of Z-number, [8][9][10][11] (ii) computing with words (CWWs), [12][13][14] and (iii) transformation of the Z-number into a classical fuzzy number. [15][16][17][18][19][20] After review, it is noted that most of these studies failed to prevent the loss of original information during decision-making.…”
Section: Z-number and Hesitant Fuzzy Sets (Hfss)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite wide acceptance, several shortcomings of the traditional FMEA are reported in the literature. 18,44,45 The most critical ones are restated as follows: (1) it is hard for the experts to provide a precise and exact rating on the risk of FMs to the three risk parameters. Moreover, experts are accustomed to natural language (linguistic terms) to represent their evaluations on the risk of FMs, (2) the relative weights of the risk parameters are not taken into account in the RPN analysis, and (3) the mathematical formula for RPN is unreasonable and highly sensitive to the variations in the assessment of the risk parameters.…”
Section: Failure Mode and Effect Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the risk prioritization of occupational hazards in OHS risk assessment can be considered as a complex multicriteria decision‐making (MCDM) problem because it involves multiple risk criteria. Correspondingly, lots of MCDM methods have been utilized to rank the risk of occupational hazards in the literature 2,6,9,17 . As an efficient and pragmatic MCDM method, the TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive multicriteria decision‐making) was initially introduced by Gomes and Lima 18 for choosing suitable alternatives based on different criteria.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%