2020 IEEE 38th International Conference on Computer Design (ICCD) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/iccd50377.2020.00104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Z2-ZNCC: ZigZag Scanning based Zero-means Normalized Cross Correlation for Fast and Accurate Stereo Matching on Embedded GPU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the implementations which are optimized and deployed on FPGA architectures are superior to those running on an embedded GPU. Furthermore, the superiority in terms of throughput of algorithms, such as those from Cui and Dahnoun [ 41 ] and Chang et al [ 26 ] that do not rely on a complex regularization scheme such as the SGM is also to be expected. Nonetheless, our approach has a lower throughput than a similar implementation of Hernandez-Juarez et al [ 25 ], while simultaneously being deployed on a more powerful system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As expected, the implementations which are optimized and deployed on FPGA architectures are superior to those running on an embedded GPU. Furthermore, the superiority in terms of throughput of algorithms, such as those from Cui and Dahnoun [ 41 ] and Chang et al [ 26 ] that do not rely on a complex regularization scheme such as the SGM is also to be expected. Nonetheless, our approach has a lower throughput than a similar implementation of Hernandez-Juarez et al [ 25 ], while simultaneously being deployed on a more powerful system.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the related work from literature, the throughput and processing speed of our approach are not very impressive. We expected to reach a significantly lower throughput than approaches running on FPGAs [ 17 , 18 ], as well as a slightly lower throughput compared to approaches that do not rely on a computationally expensive optimization scheme but run on an embedded GPU [ 26 , 41 ]. However, the —SGM configuration of our approach has a lower throughput than that of a comparable configuration by Hernandez-Juarez et al [ 25 ], while at the same time running on a hardware generation that is two times newer and that has twice the number of CUDA cores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the related work from literature, the throughput and processing speed of our approach are not very impressive. We expected to reach a significantly lower throughput than approaches running on FPGAs [17,18], as well as a slightly lower throughput compared to approaches that do not rely on a computationally expensive optimization scheme but run on an embedded GPU [26,41]. However, the CT 9×7 -SGM configuration of our approach has a lower throughput than that of a comparable configuration by Hernandez-Juarez et al [25], while at the same time running on a hardware generation that is two times newer and that has twice the number of CUDA cores.…”
Section: Processing Speedmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As expected, the implementations which are optimized and deployed on FPGA architectures are superior to those running on an embedded GPU. Furthermore, the superiority in terms of throughput of algorithms, such as those from Cui and Dahnoun [41] and Chang et al [26], that do not rely on a complex regularization scheme like the SGM is also to be expected. Nonetheless, our approach has a lower throughput than a similar implementation of Hernandez-Juarez et al [25], while simultaneously being deployed on a more powerful system.…”
Section: Throughput Frame Rates and Power Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%