1998
DOI: 10.1023/a:1023089930061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Notice that the results of Section 2.1 together with results of [13,32,37,[43][44][45][46] give the full picture of behavior of model (1) for U ≤ 0, W = 0, and J z , J xy = 0 within VA approach. Cases of U > 0 as well as J z , J xy = 0 are left to future works.…”
Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Notice that the results of Section 2.1 together with results of [13,32,37,[43][44][45][46] give the full picture of behavior of model (1) for U ≤ 0, W = 0, and J z , J xy = 0 within VA approach. Cases of U > 0 as well as J z , J xy = 0 are left to future works.…”
Section: Summary and Final Commentsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We have described in [9] a singular perturbation theory in order to construct the inhomogeneous, reduced limiting dynamics in an extended C*-algebra, which beside the electron observables contains also classical observables. The latter are indexed by means of states on the one-cell algebra B.…”
Section: Model Assumptions Limiting Dynamics and Kms-statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this modified notation we may use the results of [9] to reveal an interesting connection between the stable spectral values and subgroups resp. subsemigroups of R. Observe that the quasi-particle energy of the homogeneous model is E 0 (β) = η 2 + ∆ 0 (β) 2 .…”
Section: (Note the Contradistinction Between Operator And State Occupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations