Žalobní typy ve správním soudnictví – Aktuální otázky

Svoboda, Tomáš; Halml, František; Hejč, David; Hrubešová, Sára; Skládalová, Denisa

doi:10.5817/cz.muni.m280-0249-2022

2022

DOI: 10.5817/cz.muni.m280-0249-2022

|View full text |Cite

Žalobní typy ve správním soudnictví – Aktuální otázky

Tomáš Svoboda,

František Halml,

David Hejč

et al.

Abstract: The aim of the monograph is to identify some “current issues” concerning the system of types of action in the Code of Administrative Justice. The legislation regulating the basic aspects of the Czech Administrative Justice system enters its twentieth year of effectiveness in 2022. However, during this time some challenges have emerged, which the monograph seeks to discuss and analyze.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Smíšené právní instituty ve veřejné správě – k některým otázkám právního dualismu

Svoboda

2024

Auc Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is generally accepted that law consists of two main domains – private and public. At the same time, there is clear scepticism about the sharp separability of these domains. The problém of distinguishing private and public law is undoubtedly also a problem of public administration and its implementation as it is possible that the public purpose will also be fulfilled by private law norms. In addition, there may be legal institutes that combine more or less the norms of public and private law, for which the designation of hybrid legal institutes seems appropriate. However, such institutes may present some difficulties associated with legal dualism. The aim of this two-part paper (within its limited scope) is to provide a basic introduction to the issue of socalled hybrid legal institutes. In the first part of the paper, besides some general background, the text presents a triad of such institutes that are applied in the context of public administration and for which some debate over their legal nature could be observed in the domestic literature. In the second part (which will be published in a future issue of the journal), the text attempts to answer the research question of how to deal with these institutes, or rather considers some basic criteria for distinguishing private and public law in the context of public administration regulation.

show abstract

Smíšené právní instituty ve veřejné správě – k některým otázkám právního dualismu

Svoboda

2024

Auc Iuridica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Žalobní typy ve správním soudnictví – Aktuální otázky

Cited by 1 publication

References 10 publications

Smíšené právní instituty ve veřejné správě – k některým otázkám právního dualismu

Smíšené právní instituty ve veřejné správě – k některým otázkám právního dualismu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About