2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2005.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zariski closure, completeness and compactness

Abstract: The categorical theory of closure operators is used to introduce and study separated, complete and compact objects with respect to the Zariski closure operator naturally defined in any category X (A, Ω) obtained by a given complete category X (endowed with a proper factorization structure for morphisms) and by a given X -algebra (A, Ω) by forming the affine X -objects modelled by (A, Ω).Several basic examples are provided.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One easily shows (see [19]) that z is an idempotent and hereditary closure operator of Aff K (X ) in the sense of [14]. We may now restrict this closure operator to Ext K,M (X ) (along the functor J of 4.1) and define the Zariski closure of M in (X, r, A) ∈ Ext K,M (X ) by…”
Section: Definition 54 Recall That For An M-subobjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One easily shows (see [19]) that z is an idempotent and hereditary closure operator of Aff K (X ) in the sense of [14]. We may now restrict this closure operator to Ext K,M (X ) (along the functor J of 4.1) and define the Zariski closure of M in (X, r, A) ∈ Ext K,M (X ) by…”
Section: Definition 54 Recall That For An M-subobjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular (see [14,15]): Proof (Prop. 5 in [19]) Let the separated K-Chu spce (X, r, A) be complete. As observed in the proof of 5.3, the canonical morphism (g X , γ X ) lies in M, with its codomain X (k,A) K being separated.…”
Section: Definition 54 Recall That For An M-subobjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that in [6], E. Giuli obtains analogous results, using different techniques involving the Zariski closure. In particular, he proved that the subconstruct of absolutely Emb(Ap 0 )-closed objects of Ap 0 coincides with the epireflective hull of P in Ap 0 and that this construct is firmly U -reflective in Ap 0 .…”
Section: U -Firmness Of the Sober Approach Spaces In Apmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Of course, one can now also take a look at the composition P * of the functor D * with the coreflector T A : Prap → Prtop to obtain the functor P * : Ap → Prtop : (X, λ) → (X, T λ ∨ T ϕ −1 ). So P * sends an approach space to its Zariski closure [4,16]. Note that P * (…”
Section: Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%