2001
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zebra finch sexual differentiation: The aromatization hypothesis revisited

Abstract: Zebra finches have emerged as an outstanding model system for the investigation of the mechanisms regulating brain and behavior. Their song system has proven especially useful, as the function of discrete anatomical regions have been identified, and striking parallels exist between the morphology of these regions and the level of their function in males and females. That is, the structures are substantially more developed in males, who sing, compared to females, who do not. These parallels extend from higher (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
4
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Like the d30 results, the density of ZENK immunoreactive neurons in Area X was significantly lower than that in the mMSt of males that heard conspecific songs (t(5) = 3.82, p = 0.012), and no difference in ZENK immunoreactivity was found between the female lMSt and mMSt(t(5) = 0.41, p = 0.697). Also similar to those data from d30 birds, no significant main effects or interactions were uncovered in d45 birds using the FOS analysis, and the levels were quite low.The present data on ZENK labeling parallel the sex difference observed in the MSt with Nissl staining, in that Area X is distinct from the surrounding MSt only in males (reviewed in [34]) and, interestingly, following only conspecific song presentations. The morphological difference is therefore mirrored by a functional one: ZENK is not induced in Area X in males with song presentations but is up-regulated within the corresponding region in females similar to the rest of the MSt.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Like the d30 results, the density of ZENK immunoreactive neurons in Area X was significantly lower than that in the mMSt of males that heard conspecific songs (t(5) = 3.82, p = 0.012), and no difference in ZENK immunoreactivity was found between the female lMSt and mMSt(t(5) = 0.41, p = 0.697). Also similar to those data from d30 birds, no significant main effects or interactions were uncovered in d45 birds using the FOS analysis, and the levels were quite low.The present data on ZENK labeling parallel the sex difference observed in the MSt with Nissl staining, in that Area X is distinct from the surrounding MSt only in males (reviewed in [34]) and, interestingly, following only conspecific song presentations. The morphological difference is therefore mirrored by a functional one: ZENK is not induced in Area X in males with song presentations but is up-regulated within the corresponding region in females similar to the rest of the MSt.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…The present data on ZENK labeling parallel the sex difference observed in the MSt with Nissl staining, in that Area X is distinct from the surrounding MSt only in males (reviewed in [34]) and, interestingly, following only conspecific song presentations. The morphological difference is therefore mirrored by a functional one: ZENK is not induced in Area X in males with song presentations but is up-regulated within the corresponding region in females similar to the rest of the MSt.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…(ii) Blocking these hormones in males has not prevented the normal development of song (16,17). (iii) Females induced to form testes during early development do not develop a masculine song system or sing, even though they are exposed to testicular hormones (18,19). (iv) Genetically male and female brain tissue differ in their sexual phenotype even if they reside in the same bird and are exposed to the same gonadal hormonal milieu (20).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If E2 does normally masculinize males, then some mechanism should exist to increase its availability or activity in this sex, but oestrogen receptors in the song system appear limited overall and comparable in males and females. Similarly, consistent sex differences in plasma E2 and brain oestrogen synthesis during development have not been detected [13]. Interestingly, post-hatching E2 can have opposite, demasculinizing, effects on tissues outside the neural song circuit in zebra finches.…”
Section: Songbirdsmentioning
confidence: 91%