2017
DOI: 10.5935/abc.20170076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero Calcium Score as a Filter for Further Testing in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit with Chest Pain

Abstract: BackgroundThe accuracy of zero coronary calcium score as a filter in patients with chest pain has been demonstrated at the emergency room and outpatient clinics, populations with low prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD).ObjectiveTo test the gatekeeping role of zero calcium score in patients with chest pain admitted to the coronary care unit (CCU), where the pretest probability of CAD is higher than that of other populations.MethodsPatients underwent computed tomography for calcium scoring, and obstructi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A CACS � 0 does not defnitively rule out the presence of coronary stenosis of ≥50% or ≥70%, especially in younger patients. Previous studies have shown that among patients with CACS � 0, a range of 1.5% to 8.3% displayed coronary stenosis of ≥50%, and 1.4% presented with coronary stenosis of ≥70% [13][14][15][16][17]. Feuchtner et al found that 12.5% of young adults aged 35-49 years with CACS � 0 had coronary stenosis ≥50% [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A CACS � 0 does not defnitively rule out the presence of coronary stenosis of ≥50% or ≥70%, especially in younger patients. Previous studies have shown that among patients with CACS � 0, a range of 1.5% to 8.3% displayed coronary stenosis of ≥50%, and 1.4% presented with coronary stenosis of ≥70% [13][14][15][16][17]. Feuchtner et al found that 12.5% of young adults aged 35-49 years with CACS � 0 had coronary stenosis ≥50% [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present edition of Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia , Correia et al 9 have assessed the possibility of extending this controversial indication of CCS use for patients admitted to a coronary unit of a Brazilian tertiary hospital with higher pretest probability of obstructive CAD. Those authors have concluded that despite the limited PPV associated with a CCS over zero, CCS had a NPV of 90% for obstructive CAD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correia et al. 9 should be congratulated for using a local sample to derive a pretest probability score for acute CAD in patients admitted to a coronary unit. However, although the pretest probability used is adequate for the present study, it has important limitations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%