1993
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.48.12704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-field splitting ofCm3+inLuPO4single cryst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6. Since the next doublet is about 50 cm Ϫ1 higher for both systems, the Zeeman splitting is linear as the magnetic field increases up to 4 T. For comparing previous EPR studies, 11,14 with an assumption that the experimental errors were not significant, the differences between the effective g factors obtained from the EPR experiments and the present optical measurements are mainly due to data analyses. In the present work, the two components of the effective g factor were resulted from fitting the 8ϫ8 matrix of the Hamiltonian with the experimental data for the Zeeman splittings of the 8 S 7/2 ground state as a function of the applied magnetic field varying from 0 to 4.5 T. The contributions from off-diagonal terms are significant, even at zero field, but were not considered in the previous EPR work.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…6. Since the next doublet is about 50 cm Ϫ1 higher for both systems, the Zeeman splitting is linear as the magnetic field increases up to 4 T. For comparing previous EPR studies, 11,14 with an assumption that the experimental errors were not significant, the differences between the effective g factors obtained from the EPR experiments and the present optical measurements are mainly due to data analyses. In the present work, the two components of the effective g factor were resulted from fitting the 8ϫ8 matrix of the Hamiltonian with the experimental data for the Zeeman splittings of the 8 S 7/2 ground state as a function of the applied magnetic field varying from 0 to 4.5 T. The contributions from off-diagonal terms are significant, even at zero field, but were not considered in the previous EPR work.…”
Section: ͑7͒mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…An actinide Cm 3ϩ ion replacing a Lu 3ϩ or Y 3ϩ ions has a D 2d site symmetry. 10,11 Consequently, the 8 S 7/2 ground multiplet and the first excited multiplet 6 D 7/2 near 16 500 cm Ϫ1 (Jϭ7/2) each split into four Kramers doublets by the crystal fields. Without an external magnetic field, the major M J components for the four crystal-field doublets are Ϯ1/2,Ϯ3/2,Ϯ5/2,Ϯ7/2, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although TEM revealed no lattice amorphization, the crystallinity in the 18-year old *aCm-doped phosphate samples is not nearly as good as the same compounds that were doped with nonradioactive Ianthanide ions or much less radioactive actinides such as 248Cm [Kot et al 1993]. Based on our laser spectroscopic experiments and computational analyses, we attributed smaller scale defects and lattice distortion to the residuals of u-decay induced cascade displacements that were largely annealed at room temperature due to collective lattice dynamical interactions.…”
Section: B Metastable Lattice Distortionmentioning
confidence: 82%