2019
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3392331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-Knowledge Proof-of-Identity: Sybil-Resistant, Anonymous Authentication on Permissionless Blockchains and Incentive Compatible, Strictly Dominant Cryptocurrencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our model three different chains are used for storing patient, doctors and insurer communication respectively in p‐chain, d‐chain & i‐chain. P‐chain as a permissionless implies Zero‐Knowledge Proof‐of‐Identity (zk‐PoI) 33 consensus where miners are verified by trusted public certificates. It's really hard to get 51% control over the network by the malicious node to perform Sybil attack.…”
Section: Threat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our model three different chains are used for storing patient, doctors and insurer communication respectively in p‐chain, d‐chain & i‐chain. P‐chain as a permissionless implies Zero‐Knowledge Proof‐of‐Identity (zk‐PoI) 33 consensus where miners are verified by trusted public certificates. It's really hard to get 51% control over the network by the malicious node to perform Sybil attack.…”
Section: Threat Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this framework three chains namely p‐chain , d‐chain , and i‐chain are used to handle patients EHR, diagnosis report and claim settlement issues respectively. p‐chain is a permissionless blockchain followed by Zero‐Knowledge Proof‐of‐Identity (zk‐PoI) 33 consensus and others use PBFT. Participating node includes patients gadget, organizational server or PCs.…”
Section: Proposed Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%