Management of Concentrate From Desalination Plants 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-818045-7.00009-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero-liquid discharge concentrate disposal systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the approaches aimed at reducing this problem is Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) [9], and recently the Minimum Liquid Discharge (MLD) with which the fresh water recovery can reach values of 2.21 US $/m 3 [146]. Evaporation tanks are also used with the subsequent disposal of saline solids in sanitary landfills, causing impacts related to changes in land use, energy consumption, and its possible leaching into groundwater [147].…”
Section: Limitations and Problems Of Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the approaches aimed at reducing this problem is Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) [9], and recently the Minimum Liquid Discharge (MLD) with which the fresh water recovery can reach values of 2.21 US $/m 3 [146]. Evaporation tanks are also used with the subsequent disposal of saline solids in sanitary landfills, causing impacts related to changes in land use, energy consumption, and its possible leaching into groundwater [147].…”
Section: Limitations and Problems Of Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is important to note that MLD/ZLD systems are associated with unintended environmental impacts as a result of their high energy demand and carbon footprint. Other major issues of MLD/ZLD systems include fouling, scaling and expensive metallic materials ( Voutchkov and Kaiser, 2020 ). Therefore, future research to addresses these drawbacks are needed.…”
Section: Nf and Romentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the FO filtration, the DS is recovered and recycled back to the FO unit while the permeate may need further treatment for its direct discharge or reuse ( Wu et al, 2018 ). The energy consumption of FO systems without DS regeneration is notably lower (0.2–0.9 vs 10–14 kWh m −3 ) ( Voutchkov and Kaiser, 2020 ); therefore, from an energy-efficient and resource recovery point of view, the selection of a fertilizer draw solute for FO application can be an attractive strategy. Li et al (2017) investigated a FO system using NH 4 HCO 3 (3 mol L −1 ) as the DS to treat LFL.…”
Section: Resource Recovery Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%