2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.66.014204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero modes in the random hopping model

Abstract: If the number of lattice sites is odd, a quantum particle hopping on a bipartite lattice with random hopping between the two sublattices only is guaranteed to have an eigenstate at zero energy. We show that the localization length of this eigenstate depends strongly on the boundaries of the lattice, and can take values anywhere between the mean free path and infinity. The same dependence on boundary conditions is seen in the conductance of such a lattice if it is connected to electron reservoirs via narrow lea… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has the same spatial dependence as the quasi-localized solutions which are induced by radial potentials on 2D Dirac fermions [22]. The matching of localized states described above cannot be generalized to the case t ′ = 0, as the band of edge states is not degenerate in energy [23]. The localized state at the Fermi level becomes a resonance inside the continuum of extended states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has the same spatial dependence as the quasi-localized solutions which are induced by radial potentials on 2D Dirac fermions [22]. The matching of localized states described above cannot be generalized to the case t ′ = 0, as the band of edge states is not degenerate in energy [23]. The localized state at the Fermi level becomes a resonance inside the continuum of extended states.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the distribution of vacant sites is uneven between the two sublattices, zero energy modes will necessarily appear. This follows from a theorem in linear algebra 34 and can be seen as follows. Assume, very generally, that we have a bipartite lattice, with sublattices A and B (It can be any bipartite lattice like the square or honeycomb lattices in 2D, cubic in 3D, etc.…”
Section: Vacancies and A Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also impose a nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor exclusion constraint on the vacancies and do not allow them to interrupt the armchair edges. These restrictions, along with the compensated nature of the vacancy disorder, eliminate all previously studied and well-understood sources of vacancy-induced [9,28] zero modes in the spectrum of H.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%