2001
DOI: 10.1002/yd.23320019204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zero tolerance, zero evidence: An analysis of school disciplinary practice

Abstract: Because there is little or no evidence of the efficacy of zero tolerance, schools and school districts need to explore preventive alternatives.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
294
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 298 publications
(300 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
294
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Zerotolerance policies are intended to protect students and staff at schools from perceived harm. In some school districts across the country, however, suspensions, expulsions, and police involvement are being used not only for violent and drug-related school offenses, but also for minor school disruptions such as swearing or smoking cigarettes (Skiba, 2000).…”
Section: Scope Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zerotolerance policies are intended to protect students and staff at schools from perceived harm. In some school districts across the country, however, suspensions, expulsions, and police involvement are being used not only for violent and drug-related school offenses, but also for minor school disruptions such as swearing or smoking cigarettes (Skiba, 2000).…”
Section: Scope Of Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, suspensions have led to lengthy absences with the onus on the family to find accommodations (Carroll, 2008;Pirrie et al, 2009;Skiba & Knesting, 2001). Consistent with this research, these participants were excluded from the disciplinary and educational decisions that impacted them, and the reasons underlying their behaviours were not considered or were given little weight.…”
Section: Maintaining School Servicesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The target programs all had zero-tolerance policies aimed at reducing school violence and drug-related offences and thereby increasing student safety (Skiba, 2002;Skiba & Knesting, 2001). However, the use of these policies has been controversial (Dinkes, Cataldi, Kena, Baum, & Snyder, 2006;Fenning et al, 2012) for resulting in school exclusion, with the excluded youth often coming from disadvantaged backgrounds (Bear, 2012;Carroll, 2008).…”
Section: Maintaining School Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is as yet little evidence that such disciplinary policies contribute to improved student behavior or overall school safety (Skiba, 2000). Rather, zero-tolerance polices are becoming a threat to all youth and to any notion of equal educational opportunity.…”
Section: Discussion / Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the goal of zero-tolerance polices is to secure a safe school environment for the well-being of the students, overreliance on zero-tolerance policies has caused more harm than benefits to students as it often results in antidemocratic and unfair actions including racially discriminatory sanctions (Skiba, 2000). It further legitimizes teachers and school administrators to find a "quick and easy" solution to a complex problem without exercising deliberation and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%