2019
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2478.12759
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zeta potential of porous rocks in contact with mixtures of monovalent and divalent electrolytes

Abstract: A B S T R A C TThe zeta potential is one of the most important parameters influencing the electrokinetic coupling. Most reservoir rocks are saturated or partially saturated by natural water containing various types of ions (mostly monovalent and divalent ions). Therefore, understanding how the zeta potential behaves for mixtures of electrolytes is very important. In this work, measurements of the zeta potential for four different silica-based samples saturated by seven different mixtures of monovalent and diva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 100 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 is the same for two other electrolytes (CaCl2 and CaSO4). It is seen that the SPC in magnitude decreases with an increase of the electrolyte concentration for all studied rocks and that is in good agreement with published data in literature for monovalent electrolytes [e.g., [12][13][14][15]. Figure 6 shows the variation of the SPC in magnitude with rock types for all studied electrolytes at a representative concentration of 10 -4 M. It is seen that the SPC of Bentheim sandstone and Artificial ceramic are almost the same but significantly higher than that of Berea sandstone (more than three times) at a given electrolyte concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5 is the same for two other electrolytes (CaCl2 and CaSO4). It is seen that the SPC in magnitude decreases with an increase of the electrolyte concentration for all studied rocks and that is in good agreement with published data in literature for monovalent electrolytes [e.g., [12][13][14][15]. Figure 6 shows the variation of the SPC in magnitude with rock types for all studied electrolytes at a representative concentration of 10 -4 M. It is seen that the SPC of Bentheim sandstone and Artificial ceramic are almost the same but significantly higher than that of Berea sandstone (more than three times) at a given electrolyte concentration.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%