2019
DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019102591
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zfp281 orchestrates interconversion of pluripotent states by engaging Ehmt1 and Zic2

Abstract: Developmental cell fate specification is a unidirectional process that can be reverted in response to injury or experimental reprogramming. Whether differentiation and de-differentiation trajectories intersect mechanistically is unclear. Here, we performed comparative screening in lineage-related mouse naïve embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and primed epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs), and identified the constitutively expressed zinc finger transcription factor (TF) Zfp281 as a bidirectional regulator of cell state inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
(214 reference statements)
5
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas Lin28a and Zfp281 bind more abundantly to chromatin in serum. Our results are in line with the role of Lin28a and Zfp281 in transitioning from naive to primed state of pluripotency (Mayer et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2016). Interestingly, differential regulation of Zfp281 is only detectable by SPACE but not full proteome (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Comparative Space Of Mes Cells In Different Pluripotency Statessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Whereas Lin28a and Zfp281 bind more abundantly to chromatin in serum. Our results are in line with the role of Lin28a and Zfp281 in transitioning from naive to primed state of pluripotency (Mayer et al, 2020;Zhang et al, 2016). Interestingly, differential regulation of Zfp281 is only detectable by SPACE but not full proteome (Figure 4B).…”
Section: Comparative Space Of Mes Cells In Different Pluripotency Statessupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Strikingly, Zfp281 and Csnk1a1 KO profiles at N24 showed similarity to the E4.5 epiblast on par with WT cells cultured in 2i (Fig 4D). The strong Zfp281 phenotype is consistent with an overt differentiation delay phenotype (Mayer et al , 2020). Overall, there was a good correlation between the in vitro differentiation delay and the similarity with pre‐implantation epiblast cells, and both the 2i and N24 KO transcriptomes that were more similar to the E4.5 epiblast exhibited stronger exit‐delay phenotypes in vitro (Figs 4C and D, and EV2A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…At N24 several KOs, such as Zfp281, Tsc2, Smg5 and Smg6, retained strong similarity to the E4.5 epiblast (Figures 4C,E and S4A). Strikingly, Zfp281 KO profiles at N24 showed similarity to the E4.5 epiblast on par with WT cells cultured in 2i (Figures 4C and S4A), consistent with an overt differentiation delay phenotype (Mayer et al, 2020). Overall, there was a good correlation between the in vitro differentiation delay and the similarity with preimplantation epiblast cells: the N24 KO transcriptomes that were more similar to the E4.5 epiblast exhibited stronger exit-delay phenotypes ( Figure 4E, Figure S4B).…”
Section: The Regulatory Program For Pre-to Post-implantation Epiblastmentioning
confidence: 62%