2002
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.92.7.1100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Zip Code Caveat: Bias Due to Spatiotemporal Mismatches Between Zip Codes and US Census–Defined Geographic Areas—The Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
268
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 338 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
268
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Merging both census-derived and zip code area data has been shown to leave potential for spatial-temporal mismatch. 44 In Massachusetts, there were 474 zip code areas listed in the 1990 census, but 10% of cancer cases occurred in 193 zip code areas not included in the 1990 census 44 that resulted because of 30 zip code areas that were changed after the 1990 census; in our data, however, we found that there were no deaths with a U.S. Postal Service zip code area that did not have a corresponding 2000 census ZCTA.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Merging both census-derived and zip code area data has been shown to leave potential for spatial-temporal mismatch. 44 In Massachusetts, there were 474 zip code areas listed in the 1990 census, but 10% of cancer cases occurred in 193 zip code areas not included in the 1990 census 44 that resulted because of 30 zip code areas that were changed after the 1990 census; in our data, however, we found that there were no deaths with a U.S. Postal Service zip code area that did not have a corresponding 2000 census ZCTA.…”
Section: Limitationscontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…We were constrained to use ZIP code as the area of analysis in order to match the smallest indicator of geography available in the registry data. Although for some outcomes, ZIP code can lead to unstable associations due to heterogeneity of characteristics within a ZIP code, for most outcomes examined, results have been shown to be consistent with smaller census‐defined levels of geography 23. Neighborhood‐level socioeconomic variables at the ZIP‐code level included median rent, median household income, percentage living below the federal poverty line, percentage unemployed among those 16 years or older, and percentage with less than a high‐school education among those 25 years or older.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We were unable to analyze the prevalence of obesity at the census tract level because respondents were only asked to report their ZIP code. Another challenge associated with the use of ZIP code areas is that they are designed to efficiently deliver mail, and the boundaries change subtly on a regular basis (Krieger, Waterman, Chen, Soobader, Subramanian & Carson, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%